Nuclear Power: Between Promise And Peril

Since the incidents in the late 70's and 80's with 3-MileFrom peril to promise
Island and Chernobyl, nuclear technology has residesPublic opinion - taken hostage by
in no-man's land, between doom and dream, orextremesTechnology: extremely complex scientific &
between problem and peril. Twenty years aftertechnical challenges need global cooperation and a
Chernobyl, is a nuclear renaissance in the making? An'man on the moon' momentum
overview of the current status of nuclear technology:
Nuclear perilConclusion
Waste: technical solutions exist, but lack of a politicalNuclear technology needs to address its problems,
agreementProliferation: can and needs to beand holds tremendous promise if it does. The 'nuclear
managedNuclear safety: an issue for older nuclearoption' does not represent a single option, but offers
plants, but promising 'passive safety' designs for newmany choices on building additional reactors, a
reactorsmoratorium ( no new reactors), phaseout (reduce
existing reactors), reactor types, waste processing
The nuclear promiseand R&D expenditure.
The power of the atom: a fistful of matter holdingWhen excluding all nuclear options, a plan is needed
enough energy to power a city of a million for ahow to build an energy system without it. The fact
yearClimate change mitigation: each major nuclearthat we yet have to see such a (transparent) plan
power station saves 6 million tonne of greenhousemay relate to the fact that the numbers simply do
gasses per year compared to fossil-based electricitynot add up without the use of nuclear
generationEnergy security: abundant energy supplyenergy.------------------------------------------------------
when using advanced reprocessing and fast neutronHans De Keulenaer manages Leonardo ENERGY
reactorsinitiative, the Web portal for sustainable energy
professionals.