Congress Needs to Wake Up to Nuclear Waste Disposal, Part 2

Inside Alloy 22 Engineered Barrier Canistersposing no risk beyond the immediate vicinity, and
Within the first 1,000 years, about 99 percent of thewould be easy to clean up.
radioactivity in the reactor fuel will have dissipatedU.S. Left Behind in the Nuclear Renaissance?
through the natural process of radioactive decay. ForIn 1982, Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy
those who believe the nuclear waste will be dumpedAct, amending in 1987, levied a tax on consumers for
in some hole in the ground - as some fanaticalelectricity generated by nuclear power, and set a
environmentalists falsely compared this to a landfill1998 deadline to begin accepting used fuel. The U.S.
disposal - think again. The Department of Energygovernment defaulted. "1998 has come and gone,"
designed rust-resistant canisters lined with titaniumsaid Kraft. "It's almost nine years later and 50 utilities
drip shield to prevent water entry. A new alloy forare suing. Lawsuits are in the multiple, multiple billions
these canisters was created in 1987 called Alloy 22,of dollars." One wonders if the federal government
which is a blend of nickel, chromium and otherwill actually honor this obligation. "No one is being
corrosive-resistant metals.helped by this," Kraft complained. The DOE has
In one DOE simulation, it was found the wastesettled with Exelon and a few others to repay their
canisters wouldn't begin to rust for about 80,000interim storage costs. Utilities have been paying about
years. Kraft told us, "From the presentations at the$750 million per year since 1982. For example, Illinois
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board meetings, theconsumers have paid $3.5 billion since the inception of
amount of time that the metal is actually subjectedthe Nuclear Waste Fund; Pennsylvania consumers
to the corrosive environment is actually far less inhave paid $2.4 billion.
terms of hundreds of years." And who's to say how"There are a lot of places that want to build new
much technology will advance over the next 10,000nuclear plants," Kraft pointed out. "There are about
or 80,000 years? Imagine for a moment how much30 on the boards right now." But a lot of the
technology has changed our lives over the past onecommunities are asking, "Wait a minute, we still have
hundred years, let alone over the previous 10,000the spent fuel from the other reactor, when is all
years. The fact is we will all be long dead before athat stuff going to leave the site?"
single drop of moisture ever rusts one of thoseKraft explained, "What the communities are not
canisters. And so will the next 2000 generations ofasking for is an actual functioning disposal system,
our great grandchildren.but a believable sustainable plan for getting there. At
As a result of the geological and man-made barriers,the moment, the DOE program does not look terribly
scientific reports demonstrate the largest expectedsustainable to these communities. In each case that
annual radiation dose near Yucca Mountain would bewants a facility, the community is making it very
0.1 millirem. The Environmental Protection Agencyclear 'we want to know what the plans are for
(EPA) set an annual 15-millirem limit. The EPA's dosagemoving the nuclear waste offsite.' We have to be
is about one-half what most of us get from cosmicable to answer those questions."
rays every year. A chest x-ray gives you a muchHe is earnest about moving Yucca Mountain into the
higher dose. Occupational standards for workers atoperational stage. "I've been waking up for the past
nuclear power plants are ten times higher. Clearly,30 years wanting to solve this problem," Kraft told
both science and logical rationale are being ignoredus. "The person that has to wake up is Congress."
when politicians and environmentalists dream up suchIn a September 13th press release, the NEI wrote,
"Twilight Zone" guidelines for Yucca Mountain. When"To meet a projected increase in electricity demand
the EPA standard of one million years was proposed,of 45 percent by 2030, 12 companies or groups of
based upon a 1995 National Academy of Sciencecompanies are developing federal construction and
study, it was "unprecedented worldwide," Kraft said.operating license applications, and four companies
Is Transporting the Nuclear Waste to Yucca Mountainalready have filed applications for early site permits
Safe?with the NRC." The first wave of those nuclear
Critics worry about the dangers of transportingpower plants could be ready for commercial
nuclear waste from local sites to Yucca Mountain.operation in the 2014 to 2015 time frame.
They seem to overlook an important fact. During theIn a nutshell, U.S. consumers would be in a no-win
past 30 years, more than 3000 shipments havesituation in the absence of nuclear power. More than
traveled across the United States over 1.6 million70 percent of the electricity which comes from
highway and rail miles without a single radioactiveenergy sources that do not bring about greenhouse
episode. Used nuclear fuel has been safely shippedgases or are linked to smog and acid rain comes
tens of thousands of times outside the Unitedfrom nuclear energy. The rest comes from
States. Environmentalists would have already pouncedrenewables, especially hydroelectric power. "By
had there been an accident involving radioactiveshutting down 20 percent of our electricity doesn't
releases.make sense for this country," Kraft argued. "It's not
The DOE estimates about 175 used fuel shipmentssomething the average ordinary homeowner is going
will travel to Yucca Mountain each year for 24 years,to want to have happen."
transporting between 300 and 500 containers.And the fate of the emerging nuclear revival, or the
Numerous tests performed by Sandia Nationalnuclear renaissance, hangs by the decisions Congress
Laboratories to "destroy" the canisters demonstratedmust soon make in honoring the government's
the ruggedness of the containers. Crashing trucksobligation as the ultimate stewards of the nuclear
into concrete barriers at 65 mph, trains broadsidingwaste. "We capture all our waste," said Kraft. "We
the trucks at 80 mph and engulfing the trucks andstore it all, we know where it is, we got it numbered
canisters at crispy temperatures failed to destroy theand we treat it with great respect." Ironically, with
canisters. "To get a certificate from the Nuclearthe ongoing renaissance in uranium mining in the
Regulatory Commission (NRC), they have to passUnited States, if there were no reversal by
very severe accident tests," Kraft explained. "MyCongress, the yellowcake would end up in Asia or
guess is that, at this point, it will be fundamentally railelsewhere to fuel their galloping nuclear energy
shipments with limited trucking, but we had toprograms.
analyze both."In 2002, after more than 60 public hearings were held
Fear of terrorists? "Before September 11, 2001,in Nevada, then-Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham
these (nuclear storage facilities) were the mostcertified that Yucca Mountain meets the site selection
secure, heavily guarded industrial sites there were,"requirements. Both house of Congress approved the
Kraft told us. "And they have only gotten even moreYucca Mountain site in July 2002. "Yucca Mountain is
protected. We have increased the number of guards,an approved project as far as Congress and the
the stand-off distance from the gate, and otherPresident are concerned," concluded Kraft. "And now
things I can't talk about because of the nature of thewe have the license application to complete, get it
information. We do have very good terroristthrough the NRC, and start building it." Approval for
protection."Yucca Mountain came after one of the most
But what about on the open road? The DOE hope toextensive scientific investigations in U.S. history. The
construct a 300-mile railroad spur to connect theNRC review may take up to three years.
nation's existing rail system to Yucca Mountain. In anThe remaining stumbling block appears to be the
August 2006 Fact Sheet, the NEI writes, "The1995 report by the National Academy of Sciences,
shipments are heavily guarded. Travel routes andand adopted by the EPA, demanding a million-year
times for shipment are not publicly available; transportguarantee of safety at Yucca Mountain. This came
vehicles are equipped with devices to preventabout while Yucca Mountain was passing every
unauthorized movement; and satellites trackscientific test for the original 10,000-year safeguard.
shipments constantly." Sandia National LaboratoriesCongress can remedy this absurdity with legislation
also simulated a terrorist attack using a weapon 30relieving this EPA standard. In other words, it is time
times more powerful than a shoulder-fired, anti-tankto get realistic. Otherwise, the nuclear waste remains
missile. The result? The weapon made only ain limbo, chilling out in the cooling ponds or dry casket
quarter-inch hole, which the NRC estimated wouldstorage instead of the Yucca Mountain tunnels.
release only about one-third of an ounce ofCOPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc.
radioactive material, a minute amount of radiationALL RIGHTS RESERVED.