Explosion in Nuclear Energy Demand Coming

Summary: Sprott Asset Management uranium expertjust starting to see the weather impacts. There are
Kevin Bambrough talked with us about the "secondproblems with droughts across the world as well as
leg" of the current uranium bull market. He sees aelevated hurricane activity. Going nuclear on a mass
massive nuclear build up heading our way with "thescale is starting to become recognized as one of the
environmentalists leading the charge." He said manyonly ways to have a real impact. I think what we're
price projections may be inaccurate because "peoplegoing to see is an unprecedented build out in nuclear
are underestimating future demand."capacity throughout the world in the coming years
StockInterview: Price forecasts on spot uranium areand decades. I'd equate this to what happened when
widening. Some insiders have predicted uranium priceswe went from using oil for just lamps and home
may drop back into the $30/pound range; others,heating to using it as a transportation fuel. What's
such as yourself, continue to suggest $50/pound orgoing to happen with the people who have the
higher. Any comments on the forecasts others arehigher quality uranium reserves and lower cost
making?production? They are going to be able to reap
Kevin Bambrough:massive profits over the coming decades.
There are many people forecasting uranium pricesStockInterview: Looking ahead, do you think we'll see
now. It's important to consider their track record ofmore deals between a small uranium producer, such
forecasting prices. Look at the contracts that haveas Uranium Resources (OTC BB: URRE) and the
been written by many companies in the industry,Japanese multi-national conglomerate, Itochu
over the last number of years. Anyone who hadCorporation?
ceilings, or had signed fixed-priced contracts, hasKevin Bambrough:
been punished. Very few people in the industryI have no doubt that it's going to continue to happen.
predicted what has happened. Looking forward, IMore importantly, I've heard that some of the major
think that in our view, the cost of production ofbuilders of nuclear facilities around the world,
current producers isn't going to be as relevant as itcompanies such as Areva are quite concerned about
has been in the past. It will be the more marginal,the availability of supply going forward. When these
much higher cost producers who will be setting thecompanies are talking to countries and utilities that
price.potentially could contract to build nuclear facilities,
StockInterview: Isn't there a sense of false optimismthey're basically being told that buyers want uranium
that "projects in the pipeline" will ensure an ongoingsupply assurances, or they aren't going to give an
stream of uranium oxide for the nuclear fuel cycle?order to buy a nuclear facility. I've heard they are
Kevin Bambrough:looking to do joint ventures or at least contract with
There are a lot of people looking at the supplyemerging producers to try to get future supply.
situation going forward while underestimating futureThen, they will be able sell their nuclear technology to
demand. They are very optimistic that miningcountries and ensure supply.
projects are going to go as planned. We had recentStockInterview: Will the Chinese be satisfied with the
news that Cigar Lake had a problem. There was auranium they plan to buy from Australia, or will they
flood the. There's a couple million pounds shortfall tohave to tap into uranium production from another or
most people's models for at least two years. Allother countries?
because of one mine's six month delay.Kevin Bambrough:
StockInterview: Would that have the kind of impactI think that the Chinese will probably look elsewhere
the McArthur flooding (Athabasca Basin, Cameco) hadas well. Countries have strategic oil reserves. Why
on the spot uranium price a few years ago?shouldn't they have strategic uranium reserves to
Kevin Bambrough:supply their nuclear reactors? It makes sense to
I think it could. It was forecast to go up to 18 millionhave a good stockpile of uranium considering the
pounds of production. That would have been tenrelative cost of nuclear power versus anything else. I
percent of the world's current consumption. Cigardon't think that the nuclear power industry should
Lake would need to ramp up over a three yearoperate on a just in time basis, considering the costs
period, once it gets started. Now, there is a sixand the risks of making sure you can secure supply.
month delay. What if it's delayed a year? That reallyDon't get me wrong. There is plenty of uranium in
changes the production profile for the next decade.the world, but we're just going to have to pay up
There are many projects that could see delays. Thefor it. I believe we're going to consume lot more than
mining business is always full of delays. Rememberwhat we're consuming nowadays - a decade or two
that when we bring on new nuclear plants, they takeout. The world is waking up to the reality of peak oil
on average about 1.6 million lbs when commissioning.production, and how it is going to affect all aspects
What will happen, if in a decade, we bring on just 10of energy production.
or 20 reactors each year? That's another 16 to 30StockInterview: How much of a factor will Russia
million pounds per year of demand just because ofplay in the nuclear build up?
the start up.Kevin Bambrough:
StockInterview: Does this mean the current uraniumLooking at some of the recent statements made by
bull market still has strong legs?Russian officials, it's completely clear to me that
Kevin Bambrough:we've been correct in what we've been thinking for
I think we're entering the second leg of the bulla long time: the HEU agreement (to deliver highly
market here. It is going to move away from a supplyenriched uranium and have it blended down) is
shortage story, where we focus on the fact that weprobably not going to be renewed. The Russians are
only get about 60 percent of the currentplanning to make nuclear technology a key export
consumption from mines, while the inventories arefor them, really as a value added product to go with
being worked off. Now, we're moving into a situationuranium production. They desire to be able to offer a
where we're seeing an explosion in demand growth.complete solution, not just uranium, but the actual
Just a couple of years ago when we first startedbuilding and technology around the nuclear facilities
investing in uranium, we could see probably about athemselves. They will also have growing uranium
dozen nuclear facilities being planned for constructiondemands domestically and have voiced concern about
throughout the world. Now we've got well over 100being able to meet their own needs beyond 2015.
being planned. It seems there are new additions andStockInterview: But nuclear energy critics claim all of
talk of more additions every day.these power plants won't secure financing and most
StockInterview: How you envision this nuclear buildupplans are just pipe dreams never to be built.
rolling out?Kevin Bambrough:
Kevin Bambrough:Two years ago, the critics said there would never be
I don't think it's unreasonable to think, looking ten toany more nuclear plants built in the U.S. People used
twenty years out, there are going to be a lot ofto say nuclear was over for Germany, and that
countries that will be trying to get in the position thatmany countries would exit nuclear power. Now we're
France is in, with a much higher percentage of theirseeing the exact opposite. We're seeing proposals
power coming from nuclear generation. We could seebeing done, incentives put in place, and a multitude of
a move to where maybe 50 percent of globalprojects moving ahead. If what the leading scientists
energy production or more could eventually befrom NASA, the NOAA and from many organizations
supplied by nuclear. There is nothing else that canaround the world are saying about global warming,
really step up and fill the void and take care of thisand the acceleration we've recently seen continues,
problem that we're having. France produces 78people are going to be begging to have more nuclear
percent of their electricity from nuclear. Why isn'tfacilities and cut CO2 emissions. The environmentalists
that reasonable for others? Look out a decade orwill be leading the charge.
two, and it doesn't appear like we're going to haveStockInterview: How long will it take before the
the oil and the gas in order to handle our needs.proposed nuclear build up impacts the uranium mining
Obviously we can do more with coal, but if we'recompanies?
going to keep using coal we've got to put in placeKevin Bambrough:
technology to take care of the carbon dioxideThe actual build of all this takes time. I think the
sequestration. If you want to have a stable, secureincrease in the positive perception, of the nuclear
supply of electricity, it seems that you're going toindustry is going to continue to accelerate. All demand
have to go with more nuclear or eventually withfor uranium can come from just the planning stage
these new coal technologies. I think there is going tofor nuclear power plants, as companies look forward
have to be a balance of both, because the oil andand try to contract future supply. Ultimately, that's
gas just isn't going to be there.what will keep driving the uranium price higher.
StockInterview: What do you think is the catalyst forStockInterview: How seriously is the nuclear industry
this anticipated growth in nuclear energy demand?taking the global build up?
Kevin Bambrough:Kevin Bambrough:
The most interesting thing is the fact that someI think the industry is starting to take it very
environmentalists are leading the charge to go moreseriously. That's why the uranium price keeps pushing
nuclear. It's because they realize nuclear energy is thehigher. People are going around trying to contract for
only practical alternative and because of the situationuranium, and they are finding it more difficult. People
with the carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. There haveare also starting to realize that as you have
been some recent reports about CO2 levels reachingproblems, such as the McArthur River flooding, which
381 parts per billion, just spiking out of the range thatgot the uranium bull market jump started, and now a
has kept the world in a relatively stabile environmentproblem at Cigar Lake, you really should have a good
for the last 400,000 years. If you look at the workbuild up of inventory in order to protect yourself in
of people like James Hanson, the correlation betweenthis environment. Especially when the relative cost of
CO2 levels and temperature is undeniable. Basically,having to switch off a nuclear facility to go to
mankind has increased the CO2 levels beyond a levelsomething else in a pinch is multiples higher.
that hasn't been seen in over a million years. We are