A Nuclear Power Plant May Be Next for New Mexico

Federal lawmakers patted themselves on the back,for future disposal, and immediately provides energy.
last Friday, in a joint bi-partisan news release issuedThe major issue in the western United States, about
by three New Mexico politicians: U.S. Senators Petenuclear waste, is "please don't put it in our backyard."
Domenici and Jeff Bingaman, and U.S. CongressmanSeveral western states have been approached, and
Steve Pearce. Their celebratory remarks were meanteven the Carlsbad area was once discussed. Through
to remind voters why the politicians were inthe ABR technology, it may be possible to minimize
Washington - to bring their state new jobs for atthe amount of this waste to make it a less
least some of New Mexico's voters. While the chorusundesirable disposal problem. A look at local New
of praise revolved around creating new jobs andMexico politics may provide an insight as to where
bringing millions of dollars into the state's economy, isthe two U.S. senators may be heading with regards
there more behind this story, which has not yet beento a nuclear power plant for New Mexico.
told?New Mexico's Enrichment Facility:Prelude to a Nuclear
For Senator Domenici, this was another major victoryPower Plant?
as the longest serving U.S. Senator in New Mexico'sIf Federal lawmakers are happy about the proposed
history. The Republican Senator heads the Senateuranium enrichment facility, some of New Mexico's
Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Domenicistate politicians were still floating on clouds when we
made his views on nuclear energy quite clear in histalked to them yesterday. New Mexico legislator John
book "A Brighter Tomorrow: Fulfilling the Promise ofA. Heaton, the Democratic representative serving
Nuclear Energy" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004). HeCarlsbad, waxed enthusiastic about the enrichment
began pursuing Louisiana Energy Services to move tofacility, "It's the first step in converting this country
New Mexico in February 2003, after it becameto nuclear energy."
apparent Hartsville, Tennessee didn't want uraniumMainly the four state senators and representatives,
being enriched in their backyard.whom we interviewed, echoed each other's praise
And again, it was Domenici, whose last minuteabout Urenco's proposed enrichment facility. "I could
negotiations with Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman,not be more pleased," Senator Carroll H. Leavell told
led to the adoption of the Part 810 Waiver. Theus. "It will have a major, very positive impact on the
waiver allowed Louisiana Energy Services (LES) toeconomy." At the peak of construction, as many as
contact foreign-owned Urenco Ltd about transferring1200 workers may be employed. Later, when the
high technology data (the gas centrifuge technology)facility is operational, about 300 workers will remain.
to LES so the uranium enrichment technology couldAll four were pleasantly surprised that town hall
be utilized at the new facility. U.S. laws ordinarilyhearings for the proposed facility were
prohibit such nuclear technology transfers, butoverwhelmingly positive, and the local citizens would
Domenici's intervention brought the project to thebe delighted to have this facility in built in
NRC approval stage. LES had been on the drawingsoutheastern New Mexico. Senator Leavell said with
boards since 1989, having derived its name from thedisgust, "Most of the (anti-nuclear) protests have
state of Louisiana. The LES partnership was initiallycome from outside our area, places like San
formed with the intent of building its centrifugeFrancisco, DC and Santa Fe."
enrichment plant in Homer, Louisiana.Senators Leavell and Gay G. Kernan, the state
Senator Domenici's impact upon the nuclearsenator from Hobbs, were invited by Urenco Ltd. to
resurgence in the United States is evident to thetour an enrichment technology plant in Almelo,
entire industry and most politicians. He announced lastNetherlands and left impressed with the company, its
year, "In 1997, I predicted the resurgence of nuclearhonesty and especially the management's attitude of
energy in the United States. For the last eight years,looking at both sides of the issues. Both state
I have worked to help make that renaissance asenators also observed the surrounding community
reality." Is there, perhaps, one more achievementfailed to be negatively impacted by the enrichment
Senator Domenici would like to add on behalf of thefacility.
nuclear industry, before giving up his Senate seat? InLooking for deeper insights into what the future
his book, "A Brighter Tomorrow," Domenici bemoansmight hold, we asked all four about the possibility of
and condemns nuclear fuel reprocessing. With thea nuclear power plant in New Mexico. All four agreed
advent of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnershipit would be desirable. Additional comments by the
(GNEP), Domenici may bring a nuclear power plant tofour state politicians led us to believe there might be
New Mexico before he retires.a second step, following Heaton's remark about the
Domenici's Democratic counterpart, Senator Jeffenrichment facility being the first step.
Bingaman, is the ranking Democrat on the SenateDonald L. Whitaker, the Democratic legislator from
Energy and Natural Resource Committee. WeEunice, the closest town to the proposed enrichment
suspect Bingaman may play an integral role in helpingfacility, told us, "I would like to see a nuclear reactor
Senator Domenici fulfill that dream. Ironically, Senatorin New Mexico." Whitaker has toured a nuclear facility,
Bingaman, who last November was invited to a Santaand believes one would be great for the state's
Fe anti-nuclear environmentalist fundraiser, and whicheconomy. "They employ about one thousand and
highlighted television mogul Ted Turner, was effusivebring high-paying jobs," he said. Representative
in saying about the LES enrichment facility, "This willWhitaker was not the lone voice among his fellow
be one of the largest construction projects our stateeastern New Mexican legislators.
has ever seen. And the economic impact in"Yes, we want a nuclear reactor in New Mexico,"
southeastern New Mexico will be tremendous." DoesRepresentative Heaton said. Heaton is the legislature's
Bingaman appear to be playing both sides of theVice Chairman of the Radioactive and Hazardous
nuclear chessboard?Materials committee and a member of the Energy &
No, the former attorney, who reportedly onceNatural Resources Committee. He discussed the ABR
provided legal advice to uranium mining powerhouse,technology and GNEP, explaining how this would solve
Kerr McGee, is deftly maneuvering between being athe waste disposal problem of nuclear reactors and
good Democrat and providing what he may honestlysway public opinion on nuclear energy.
believe is best for his state. While Bingaman hasSenator Leavell took a more cautious approach,
curried favor among the environmentalists, in May ofexplaining how nuclear reactors need tremendous
this year, he accepted, along with Domenici andamounts of water. "I don't think New Mexico could
others, the William S. Lee Award for Leadership athave a nuclear reactor, not with the current
the Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI) annualtechnology." But, he still agreed it would be a good
conference, saying, "I share a belief that nuclearidea if new technologies were developed, which used
power can make a meaningful contribution toless water.
controlling the growth of greenhouse gases, while stillSenator Gay Kernan told us, "I don't know if I should
allowing our economy to expand." It was hisbe talking about this, but we are one of the
subsequent remark directed at the NEI, which leadscandidates for the GNEP program." Having heard a
us to believe he may be among the first to supportrumor that General Atomics may propose building a
additional nuclear growth in New Mexico. He told thenuclear power plant in eastern New Mexico, Senator
NEI, "I am hoping that you will do your part to useKernan confirmed such a plant may be on the
those tools that Congress has put in place to ensuredrawing boards, and telling us West Texas is likely to
that nuclear power achieves its potential as part ofbe developed as an "alternative energy corridor." She
our future energy mix."told us, "It would stretch from Carlsbad, New Mexico
The Global Nuclear Energy Partnershipto the Odessa-Midland, Texas area." Senator Kernan
In March 2006, Senator Domenici pledged his supportwould also like New Mexico to have a nuclear plant, "I
to President Bush's Global Nuclear Energy Partnershipdon't have a problem with that."
(GNEP),The third politician, joining Senators Domenici and
"With GNEP, we begin to close the cycle on nuclearBingaman, in praising the NRC approval of a draft
waste in ways that prevent proliferation and reducelicense for LES and Urenco Ltd, was U.S.
both the volume and toxicity of waste. By recyclingCongressman Steve Pearce. Comments, issued by his
spent nuclear fuel, we can reuse the uranium, whichpress secretary on Friday and praising the LES
is 96 percent of spent fuel, and separate the mostannouncement, may foreshadow New Mexico's next
toxic radioactive material to be burned in anstep, "Today's announcement marks a major
advanced burner reactor. By reusing uranium fuel andmilestone in our efforts to cement our state's
burning the transuranic material in a new generationleadership role in the development of alternative
of modern reactors, we can reduce the amount ofenergy." What greater leadership by a state than in
waste placed in Yucca Mountain by a factor of 100."introducing the new GNEP ABR technology in New
One of the key technologies in the GNEP program inMexico? After all, the state of New Mexico remains
is the Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR). Deriving itsthe founding home to nuclear technology, where the
technology from fast reactors, which were used toworld's first atomic technology was designed at Los
make nuclear weapons, the concept of the ABR is toAlamos.
minimize the amount of nuclear waste, produced byIn a related development, David Watts, President of
the nuclear industry's power plants, to a tiny fractionthe University of Texas of the Permian Basin,
of content. The concept behind the ABR is to "burn"recently met with Congressman Pearce about
the transuranic elements, such as plutonium and otherdeveloping a helium-cooled nuclear reactor facility,
long-living radioactive material. In this case, burning thewhich would be built underground in either Lea
radioactive waste is translated as: destroying theCounty, New Mexico or Andrews County, Texas.
transuranics, by converting them into shorter-livedGeneral Atomics of San Diego has funded the
isotopes. When the transuranic elements arepre-conceptual design, which is underway and
consumed by the ABR, a large amount of energy isscheduled for completion in August. Waste Control
released and then converted into electricity.Specialists has a low-level radioactive waste storage
Instead of burying several football fields of nuclearsite in Andrews County. Realistically, a nuclear reactor
waste in Yucca Mountain (or elsewhere) for onein New Mexico is not out of the question. The
million years, the toxic waste would be recycled aslegislators may get what they want. We believe
energy to be immediately used to power homes andSenator Domenici will ultimately set into motion the
industry. Part of the GNEP plan is to combine theplans to bring New Mexico its first nuclear power
current, or advanced, light water reactors with theplant. It would become his crowning achievement in
ABR. As the light water nuclear reactors producehelping the nuclear renaissance blossom in this
transuranics, the ABRs consume those highlycountry and in his state.
radioactive elements. This leaves less nuclear waste