What is nuclear energy and how it is obtained
 

Welcome to our nuclear energy Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #47: Nuclear Energy - The Green Solution

(Browse for more articles)

 
The United States with less than 5% of no visual pollution, it is cost
the world's population consumes roughly relatively cost effective, quiet and we
25% of the world's energy. Some might have sufficient supply of uranium here at
argue that this is egregious, while home for the foreseeable future to
others would say that it is simply a provide for a major portion of our energy
yardstick by which the world's largest needs. Historically, at least, the
economy is measured. But for whatever problem with nuclear energy has been
the reason for our vast consumption of primarily two fold. First, the "China
energy, the fact remains that in order to Syndrome" problem of a meltdown of a
consume you first have to produce. And reactor which could release a large
as most of our energy comes from burning amount of radioactivity and second, what
fossil fuels- which wouldn't be too bad do we do with nuclear waste material that
except that: has a half-life of over 25,000 years!
(1) burning vast amounts of fossil fuels The perception of these two significant
in this county alone dumps millions of obstacles might doom a new nuclear drive
pounds of earth warming greenhouse gasses and stand in the way of an
into, what appears, is a fragile energy-independent United States.
atmosphere, every day. Just warming up However, there are new technologies in
the atmosphere a couple of degrees on this field that, like the cavalry, have
average has significant impact. Look no come to our rescue- and none too soon.
further than last year's hurricane First, there is a new class of nuclear
season. The worst on record. And... reactors that have their nuclear fuel so
(2) let's not forget its close cousin; structured that they cannot do a melt
smog pollution, which adds to respiratory down. Turn off the cooling to this new
problems and other health conditions, not nuclear reactor and it only gets a bit
to mention the visual blight hanging over hotter. No big deal. Turn the cooling
our cities as well. In addition... back on and it runs more efficiently.
(3) have you filled your tank recently? Okay, one down. But what about all that
Paid the heating bill? The cost of all radioactive spent reactor fuel? Let's
fossil fuels, even coal has increased see if we can put some perspective on it.
significantly. As other emerging If you gathered all the spent nuclear
economies such as China and India vie for fuel in this country under one roof it
ever more limited resources, all bets are would fill a typical high school gym. Not
that the costs will continue to climb too unmanageable. Moreover, the spent
over the long haul. Moreover... fuel is encapsulated in super strong
(4) as we import most of our oil glass beads, which in turn are embedded
nowadays- we are increasingly held into hardened concrete inside steel
hostage to an unstable supply from a drums. This makes the waste product
number of countries that we, for whatever "transportable" and is designed to
reasons, are increasingly unpopular with. withstand the elements for 10,000 years.
The end game? If our supply of oil is Nevertheless, even in it's tomb it is
not first arbitrarily cut off, as it still relativity radioactive. Most of
becomes increasingly scarce the price these drums are stored in water as
will rise until our growth is strangled. radiation cannot penetrate more than
In either case we will feel impelled to about 3 feet of water. However, no one
engage in war with other rising powers to seems anxious to have it in their back
secure our supplies. yards. A political hot potato to be
The bottom line: Fossil fuels are not sure.
only hazardous to our health (and the But while our politicians don't have the
planet's) but may in fact be hazardous to answer, the earth does. The answer lies
the American way of life. in the bottom of the Marianas Trench in
But if energy is the lifeblood of our the Pacific. It is the deepest place in
economy what are we to do? Wind? Solar? the ocean (over seven miles) and one of
While anything we can do other than the fastest moving subduction plates on
consume fossil fuels will help, these earth. If the drums of waste were placed
sources of energy are relatively diffuse in the bottom of the trench, they would,
and inconsistent. In other words, their within a few hundred years, be swallowed
"cost to calorie" ratios are not up into the bowels of the earth and blend
efficient and they are not always into the earth's core where heat and
dependable. As James Kunstler points out pressure (caused in part by radioactive
in his intriguing book The Long substances contained within the earth)
Emergency, one of our best options out of rendered insignificant.
these dilemmas is to do an "Apollo Given the current geopolitical situation,
Project" type effort to develop which only seems to be working to our
additional, new nuclear energy disadvantage, limited resources for cheap
capability. As it turns out, it just may fossil fuels, not to mention the
be the greenest, viable alternate we environmental impacts we are starting to
have. experience, it is time we take drastic
The U.S. currently produces about 20% of measures to get us off our fossil fuel
its electrical power from nuclear power. addition. Let's hope we are not too
The advantages are; that there are no late.
greenhouse emissions into the atmosphere,






1- A- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51- 52- 53- 54- 55-