How Did ISL Uranium Mining Begin?

It's time to rewrite the history books. In Situ Leachexperiment." Results were good on the test, and
Mining (ISL), or Solution Mining, was not firstUtah pioneered ISL mining. Snow wrote in an August
commercially started in Bruni, Texas in 1973 by2, 1960 memo, "The favorable results of the heap
Westinghouse, a consortium of oil companies andleach project and other research indicate that the
others. The birthplace of ISL was never Southprocess can be successfully applied in many of the
Texas, as some have claimed. It was begun inlow-grade areas to recover much of the
Wyoming, about 16 years before an ISL operationmineralization." Later in his report, Snow calculated
was started in Texas. Why there has been areserves from random samples obtained from
whitewash over the true history of ISL is not ourprevious drilling at Lucky Mc, "The estimated reserve
concern. This series is an in-depth investigation intofor the block is 147,000 tons @ 0.0361 percent
how and why ISL mining came about, how it hasU3O8, or 106,616 pounds of U3O8." He estimated the
been tested over a period of nearly 50 years, andprogram would cost $111,471. Using a value of $6
why this type of uranium mining will play an importantpound for U3O8, the anticipated returns were
role in providing U.S. utilities with the raw fuel tocalculated as follows:50 percent recovery: 53,318
power nuclear reactors for the next few decades.Inpounds: $208,377
this modern era of uranium mining, extremely skilled25 percent recovery: 26,654 pounds: $ 48,453That
engineers, hydrologists and geologists establish ISLwas just the start. By the end of the decade, Shirley
mining operations. Most insiders compare an ISLBasin's solution mining operation was producing U3O8
operation to a water treatment plant. It's really thatat comparable levels to present day production at
simple to understand. However, as with everyany of the major U.S. ISL facilities. In a paper
modern industrial operation, the roots of ISL miningpresented by Ian Ritchie and John S. Anderson,
came about in a less genteel or sophisticated manner.entitled "Solution Mining in the Shirley Basin," on
In 1958, Charles Don Snow, a uranium mining andSeptember 11, 1967, at the American Mining Congress
exploration geologist employed by the Utahin Denver, Colorado, these Utah International
Construction Company, was investigating a Wyomingexecutives explained the success of the Shirley Basin
property for possible acquisition for his company.solution mining operation. In a summary explaining the
During the course of that visit, he discovered a newcompany's activities, we discovered the Shirley Basin
method of uranium mining and helped pioneer itsoperation not only filled the Atomic Energy
development into the modern form of ISL.Since 1957,Commission (AEC) allocation requirements from 1962
R.T. Plum, president of Uranyl Research Company,through 1969 but we learned of the sizeable
had been experimenting with a leach solution on hiscommitments into the future Shirley Basin was to
property at the Lucky June uranium mine. "Theyfill:"In 1968 sales of uranium concentrate were made
mixed up the sulfuric acid solution and just dumped itto purchases other than the AEC. One of the first
on the ground, and soaked it through the materialsales was to Sacramento Municipal Utility District with
and collected it in a little trench at the end," Charlesa minimum of 950,000 pounds to a maximum of
Snow told StockInterview. It wasn't very scientific.1,100,000 pounds of uranium concentrate in 1971.
Snow added, "They were just learning how, and IAdditional contracts were signed with General Electric
observed it and thought that the application could beCompany and with Nordostschwerzerische
made through some of the ore that we had in theKraftwerke A.G. (Baden, Switzerland). The contracts
Lucky Mc mine." The company was mining uraniumcalled for delivery of 8,000,000 pounds of
this way because it was below the grades minersconcentrate to GE between 1968 and 1975, and
were used to, when mining. As Snow noted, "It was500,000 pounds of concentrate to NOK commencing
not worth mining." But it was practically at thein July 1969."ConclusionThe single reason solution
surface. He explained what they were doing at themining stopped, well before the first "commercial" ISL
Lucky June, "There was an area where uraniumoperation began in Bruni, Texas in 1973, was because
leached out to the surface in a small area, and it hadof the improved market forecast for uranium in the
a clay under-bed. These people put solutions onto the1970s. Utah Construction switched to open pit mining
surface, collected the solution, and ran it by resinbecause they needed to produce a lot more uranium.
beads to absorb the uranium."While they onlyThe nuclear renaissance of the 1970s demanded
recovered about $3600 worth of uranium, roughlymassive quantities of uranium to fuel the rapidly
600 pounds, Snow was impressed. He later wrote angrowing nuclear power industry.Don Snow's initial field
inter-office memorandum in July 1959, with thetests, begun in the late 1950s, resulted in continuous
subject header: "Recovery of Uranium from Lowproduction achieved by late 1962. Subsequently,
Grade Mineralization using a leach in place process." Inproduction in the underground uranium mine was shut
his conclusion, Snow recommended, "From thedown by May 1962. The underground mine was
preliminary information available, it appears that it willmaintained in a standby condition until 1965, when all
be possible to treat very low grade mineralization forunderground operations were written off. Millions of
recovery of uranium at a large net profit." Hepounds were mined by Utah Construction through its
explained the process to his bosses, encouragingISL operations in Shirley Basin. It wasn't heap
them to consider this as an option:"In brief, theleaching.Sufficient evidence confirms that Wyoming,
process introduces a leach solution onto the surfacenot Texas, first pioneered commercial ISL mining. Not
of the ground and allows the solution to percolateonly were well fields designed as early as 1960, but
down through the area to be leached. The solution isthe entire concept of an ISL "water treatment" plant
then recovered from wells and circulated through ancan trace its roots to Utah Construction's pioneer
ion exchange circuit with the barren solution beingwork. Everything from injection wells to production
returned to the leach area. Recovery of the uraniumwells were pioneered in the early 1960s. We
is made by stripping from the ion exchangechallenged Charles Don Snow that some have claimed
medium."He wanted the Utah Construction Companyit was heap leaching, not ISL mining. Snow shot back,
to try this method of mining where there was low"No, we drilled holes in the ground and the material
grade mineralization. Snow succeeded in convincing hishad never been mined. We got our ideas, certainly,
bosses. That began yet another innovation for Utahfrom heap leaching, which came from the copper
Construction Company, the same company whichindustry." Snow explained that after the solution
helped construct the Hoover Dam, decades earlier,mining experiment was successful, "A recovery plant
before it got into the uranium mining business.Utahwas designed and put into the hoist house, where
Construction Becomes the First Commercial ISLthey had had the underground mine. That was
MinerNewspaper reports, through the 1960s, illustratedesigned by Robert Carr Porter and Ian Ritchie."
that ISL mining was in full bloom more than a decadeSnow added, "In fact, Ian Ritchie and J.S. Anderson
before anyone in Texas began a commercial ISLhave a U.S. Patent on the well completion procedures
operation. On June 18, 1964, the Riverton Rangerthat we used at Shirley Basin."Snow pondered if his
newspaper reported, "The Shirley Basin mine is on afriend Jack Bailey may have exported the ISL
standby basis. The timbers are being maintained andtechnology to Texas. "Jack Bailey was the Shirley
the water pumped out. Total production comes fromBasin project manager for the underground mine
solution mining." Between 1962 and 1969, ISL was thewhen we switched over to solution mining," Snow
only method producing uranium at Utah's Shirley Basinsaid. "He later went to work for Chevron, and
Wyoming. Later in that same article, under theChevron had operations in Texas. I believe they even
section entitled, "Gas Hills Solution Mining," it wasexperimented with solution mining. Now, whether or
reported, "The Four Corners area is 'mined' bynot Jack was directly involved, I don't know." As it is
solution mining techniques similar to those employedwith history, many of the old-timers are gone. We
at Shirley Basin." Credit for this new mining method iswere told Jack Bailey had had a stroke a number of
also reported in that same article, "Lucky Mcyears back, and did not trace this further. There may
introduced the heap leach process of recoveringhave been others. "Some of the people from that
values from low grade ores in 1960."Charles Snowarea (Shirley Basin) had gone to Texas," Snow
explained how his company made the transition fromrecalled. "There is documentation, it was published
underground mining to solution mining, "Theinformation, and a lot of people who went to Texas,
underground mining at Shirley Basin was verycame from the Wyoming area. So, I'm sure there
expensive, and we were having a lot of heavywasn't a paucity of information being transferred."
ground problems." The sandstone aquifers containingIronically, the Westinghouse-led consortium, which
the uranium were uncemented and brittle, supportedincluded U.S. Steel and Union Carbide, among others,
with timbers. "In some places, it was too heavy towas called Wyoming Minerals. Now we know exactly
hold with timbers," said Snow. "We had to use steelwhy they chose that name.While there have been a
sets underground, and it was even mashing the steelnumber of ISL operations built and operated in
sets. So the expenses were getting very high."WaterTexas, there may be little future for uranium mining
was flowing into the open drifts at prodigious rates.in that state, unless there are new discoveries. By a
Snow recalled, "Barney Greenly said, 'Let's try solutionfew, Texas has been inaccurately called the "home
mining over here.' They did a test, and it did operateof ISL mining." Perhaps that came about because ISL
quite well. They got some pretty good results. Sooperations continued, during the uranium depression
the underground mine was shut down, and theyof the past two decades, with small amounts of
went to a solution-mining program to produce theproduction occurring in Texas. According to Energy
allocated pounds in the Shirley Basin area." TheInformation Administration figures published in June
procedure was tested for a few years before a2004, uranium reserves in Texas stand at 23 million
full-scale commercial production began. This fulfilledpounds of U3O8 based upon $50/pound uranium. By
100 percent of Utah's Shirley Basin uranium productioncomparison, Wyoming and New Mexico reserves,
allotment from the AEC.There were problems at first.using that same benchmark, reach as high as 363
"We started out initially using sulfuric acid, and wemillion and 341 million pounds, respectively.This may
had some reaction with carbonates in the formation."explain the rush by junior exploration companies, such
Sulfuric acid plus calcium carbonate produces calciumas Strathmore Minerals (TSX: STM; Other OTC:
sulfate, and this plugged up the formation. CalciumSTHJF), Energy Metals Corporation (TSX: EMC),
sulfate is gypsum, which was insoluble in the leachUR-Energy (TSX: URE), Uranerz Energy (OTC BB:
solution. "It tended to plug up the formation andURNZ), Kilgore Minerals (TSX: KAU) and others, to
reduce the transmissivity of the fluid from the inputWyoming. The large quantities of pounds are in
hole to the output recovery hole."To preventWyoming, not Texas. It may also explain why
interference with the porosity of the formation,Uranium Resources (OTC BB: URRE) has looked
Snow switched to nitric acid, but admitted, "Webeyond Texas into New Mexico to develop its ISL
were reluctant to use nitric acid because it was muchoperation, and Strathmore Minerals has quickly been
more expensive than sulfuric." But they did, becauseadvancing through its permitting stage on one of its
the nitric acid solution did not form gypsum. Unlikeproperties in that state. It is fitting that the big past
present-day ISL methods used in Texas, Nebraskauranium producing states may again become
and Wyoming, Utah Construction did not use atomorrow's leading U.S. producers. In any event, the
carbonated leaching solution in their solution mining.entire world of ISL mining owes a debt of gratitude
Nitric solution was used during the 1960s andto Charles Don Snow for his pioneering efforts in
continued until the Lucky Mc switched over to openbringing a heap leach experiment into full fruition as
pit mining.It all started as a heap leach experiment.modern-day in-situ mining.James Finch contributes to
"We had quite a bit of low grade in Lucky Mc," Snowand other publications.
told us, "so we thought we would try a heap leach