What is nuclear energy and how it is obtained
 

Welcome to our nuclear energy Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

Speculators Could Drive Uranium to $55/Pound - or Higher

SUMMARY: TradeTech LLC Chief Executive reached a point where the cheap stuff has
Gene Clark talked with StockInterview been sold. Now, we have to actually spend
about the uranium bull market, where his some money, some capital, to build new
price models show uranium prices heading facilities, new mines and new mills. That
and when to expect the peak of the was, I think, the earliest signal of the
current upward cycle of the bull market. price needing to adjust.StockInterview:
When will "hard" times again hit the Isn't there a ton of hype across all
uranium market, and how long will the media channels about the "nuclear
trough last? And what does the future renaissance" and the demand for more
hold for the uranium price? An industry nuclear energy?Gene Clark:
insider gives us his First of all, all the hype about nuclear
insights.StockInterview: When the renaissance is really in the United
uranium bull market began, did you States. The Chinese have had plans to
foresee $40/pound uranium, now that the expand for a long time. The Japanese have
spot price has risen above this been steadily adding new capacity.
level?Gene Clark: I don't think any of us Koreans have been adding new capacity.
saw $40 per pound coming. We had price Indians have been adding new capacity all
projections at the time that indicated along, all the way through this, even
probably $25 per pound, which would be a before we started this discussion on
long term equilibrium price in constant nuclear renaissance. I think that phrase
dollar terms. But, I think it was a is really focused more in the United
surprise the price went up so high. I States, which really hasn't ordered a
think what's going, the biggest factor plant since 1976 or something like that.
right now, is the advent of the so called There is a boom. Maybe it's the uranium
hedge funds or speculator funds and other renaissance.StockInterview: Is all of
such groups. The price started to go up, what we've been reading just plain
and they came into the market with the hype?Gene Clark: There is some hype, but
express purpose of buying for holding and there is also some substance. A part of
then selling into the market later to it is certainly a change in public
realize the trading profit. In 2005, the attitude about nuclear power. If I was
hedge funds were responsible for riding on an airplane, ten years ago, and
purchasing about 10 million pounds of the someone asked me what I did for a living,
29 million pounds purchased. I think the I was guaranteed to have a lousy trip,
market is now finally adjusting to the arguing about nuclear power. When I
realities of primary supply and demand. mention it now, I get a positive
It's been a depressed market for 20 or 30 response. There's been a marked shift in
years, primarily from the draw down of public attitude about nuclear power. From
excess inventories, and what we call the standpoint of the utilities that
secondary supply.StockInterview: Will would be ordering nuclear plants. To the
the speculators remain active in driving extent that they need new capacity,
the spot uranium price higher?Gene Clark: looking at nuclear now is not off the
I think there is still some room for drawing boards, partly because of public
further speculation activity. Uranium attitude. The industry has been moving
Participation Corporation, for example, through this trough period, preparing
is rumored to be about to come to the itself for a new era. It remains to be
equities market again to raise funds for seen when the first order comes. But
another purchase. They're asking for when the first actual order of a nuclear
authority to buy UF6, as well as U308, power plant, along with the license
and different forms of uranium than they application does come, I think you'll see
were locked into before. Whether it be at several U.S. utilities following,
the 10 million pound level (size of probably five utilities very actively
purchase), I think it kind of depends on involved.StockInterview: When will that
where the market goes. If it tends to actually happen?Gene Clark: I think it
flatten out, then I think there's going will come within the next five years, the
to be obviously less interest on their ordering process. Of course it will be
part. When they were active in the probably another eight years before we
market, they, of course, wanted the price actually see the first power plant from
to go up. Therefore, they weren't too that process. We're talking probably
careful about what they paid for uranium. about 13 years. That's how long it takes.
I think that's a part of it. In the long You can actually construct one in 48
run, it was due for a readjustment to months, but you have to have been through
reflect prices of the cost of new the licensing. If you don't believe the
production facilities. But, the hedge anti-nuclear people are going to be
funds came in and overdrove the market. psyched up to fight the first plant
Eventually, what it's going to wind up coming through, then you'd be very
doing is, if they sell off, it could have naĆÆve. The first one is going to be more
the impact of driving prices back down difficult and take more time, I
below where they would otherwise have think.StockInterview: One anti-nuclear
gone.StockInterview: Did the speculators group told us they do not believe we'll
interfere with the trading efficiency of have more nuclear power plants in the
the uranium market?Gene Clark: In theory, United States.Gene Clark: That's
speculators come in, tend to take the possible, but given the current
risk and smooth out market prices. But, circumstances, my guess is we will have
it never really works out that way. They more nuclear plants. We need the
always come in and only take the risk, if capacity, whether we're going to build
there's an opportunity to make money. So coal plants (or other types of power
some people make a lot of money. It does generating plants). I just came from
tend to upset the market. If you get away California, moved here (to North
from the primary users of uranium and Carolina) six months ago. They were
primary producers of uranium as your talking in California about building
market participants, then you tend to gas-fired plants for base load
introduce more noise than you would generation, which is the most ridiculous
like.StockInterview: With that in mind, thing you can imagine. The plants are
in which direction are your price cheap to build, but the fuel cost is
projections going?Gene Clark: We're exorbitant. I did a speech a couple of
actually updating our uranium price years ago, having looked at the Energy
forecast right now. We haven't decided on Information Administration's projections
a reference case yet. The reference cases of gas demand. All the growth in natural
we're looking at will peak at about $50 gas demand is going to be in the electric
to $55 per pound in about three years, utility sector. We are going to be
and will then drop off pretty importing 60 percent of our gas supplies
drastically. It has to do with a selling by 2020. Does that make any sense? No. We
of the speculator reserves, the uranium have a lot of coal, but there are lots of
that's being held (for speculative complaints about coal burning. In our
purposes). I can see it coming back down state of North Carolina, the attorney
to $30, maybe below $30 per pound. Then, general is actually suing the Tennessee
in the long run - out through 2020 - Valley Authority (TVA) for the damage
getting easily back up over $40 per from coal burning of the TVA's power
pound.StockInterview: Are you predicting plants in the adjacent state, in
a down cycle during the course of the Tennessee. There's going to be continued
uranium bull market?Gene Clark: Yes. It's pressure on coal burning. I think nuclear
pretty consistent with everything we're has as good a shot as any in terms of new
doing with the changes in requirements, capacity.StockInterview: Some critics
in different cases of high, low, and have argued China and India will not be
medium demand. Our modeling system is able to afford the massive nuclear power
projecting this. It has to do with the plant build up they've envisioned.Gene
supply and demand balance and the cost on Clark: If you think the Chinese are going
the margin. The way to describe it is to have any problem financing things,
that prices have come to a point now of you'd better think twice. Let's focus on
higher than we would have projected them India. India is a clear case where, and
to be, such that over-supply is going to it is a good rule of thumb, one percent
evolve. The large low cost projects will growth in gross domestic product requires
reach a point where supply then one percent growth in electricity
overshoots demand for a few years, which requirement. For India to grow
causes the price to come back down. Then economically, it needs electric power.
demand growth, in the long run, picks up Where are they going to get it? They have
and puts a lot of pressure on the supply coal plants there, as well. Once you use
market to be able to meet the demand. So up all your hydro capacity, you really
you wind up with pressure toward the end don't have much to choose from, except
of the period.StockInterview: But the coal, natural gas, and nuclear. To the
markets are finicky, filled with extent that they can have economic growth
variables, and can frequently trick price and export income, coming into their
models.Gene Clark: Here's what it would country, they would be able to finance
take to shoot that down: We have a nuclear power plants. My guess is they're
problem with small numbers, and there are going to get the vendors of the nuclear
some very large projects - Cigar Lake, plant to help finance
for example. The expansion of Olympic Dam them.StockInterview: Are you talking
in Australia would be going from about 12 about the French?Gene Clark: Framatome -
million pounds of production to over 30 the company that constructs the nuclear
million pounds, if they finish. If you plants. Financing is generally part of
shift that out by four or five years, or the package. The first plants in China
if the owner decides, "No, we're not were basically financed by the French
going to expand at all," you have a government. If the French go into India,
drastic effect. Then you would wind up you'll see the same thing. The Russians
with $100 per pound uranium, I have financed plants for developing
think.StockInterview: What are your countries. That's not unusual for them to
estimates on the peak price years and the do. The United States may, or may not,
bottom years?Gene Clark: A lot of things get involved. I think there have been
could change, but here is what we're some types of guarantees in the past, but
looking at. In one case scenario, the not at the same level as the Russians and
speculators are really going to stay out French do it. I think those are the big
of the market and holding onto their choices. I wouldn't be surprised to see
stuff for a long time. If so, then we're the South Koreans involved in the reactor
going to be at the peak by the end of export market. They've pretty much
this year. If they stay active in the developed their own technology now. They
market and buying, then that stretches it have the capability of building 100
out further. Depending on the scenario, percent of a nuclear power plant in South
we see the peak possibly at 2008 or so. I Korea: the pressure vessels, all the
would say we're looking at a trough steel requirements. They can do it all.
around the timeframe of 2011 to 2013. We really haven't seen them export yet,
Then back up after that.StockInterview: because they've used up all their
How do you arrive at your weekly numbers manufacturing capacity for their own
for the spot uranium price?Gene Clark: We program. At some stage, I wouldn't be
get our data from all of the key sources: surprised to see that happen. And I think
the utility fuel managers, sales staff they would be able to finance reactor
and management of uranium producers and export sales.StockInterview: How are the
processors, and uranium traders, brokers U.S. utilities going to fare in getting
and asset managers. Some are, of course, their "share" of uranium to fuel our
more cooperative than others, and whom we domestic nuclear power plants in the
call depends on the type of information context of the apparent overwhelming
we are seeking. Since our price Asian demand?Gene Clark: In reality, the
indicators are a judgment call, we often U.S. utilities, which tend to wait longer
focus on the losers in particular recent to contract, may be the ones on the
transactions, as those will be the next losing end because the Chinese and the
to make offers in the Indians will contract early. The
market.StockInterview: Let's back up a implication of current group-think is
bit. Why has uranium gone up past the that the Chinese and Indians are not
levels of the "cost of production," which going to be able to find enough uranium
would place the spot price between $25 for their new plants. But, they are
and $35/pound?Gene Clark: The biggest committing for supplies way out into the
factor, in signaling the market, was when future. When the U.S. utilities come to
utilities went out for long term bid the market, they're going to look around
requests. They found they reached a say, "Oh blankety- blank, what happened?
period in which producers would have to Where's the uranium?" They'll be the ones
build new facilities. Producers building that sat around. I think that is what's
those facilities felt, "I have to make at going to happen unless things really
least enough profit to cover a return on change in the way contracting is done in
the construction costs for these the United States.James Finch contributes
facilities." That was much higher than to and other publications.
the market at the time. Basically, you




www.etec-nm.com keyword stats [2007-06-04-2007-06-04]


Other search phrases:

power gen renewable energy & nuclear power plant info
nuclear bomb design fun interesting things
hydro electric energy nuclear power plants in minnesota
solar powered fuel nuclear engineering design
nuclear power fact sheet nuclear war united states
minnesota nuclear power plants nuclear engineer
solar power and not oil crystal river nuclear power plant
nuclear waste management policy act united states energy statistics
united states atomic energy nuclear engineering degrees
pictures of nuclear power plants united states nuclear energy
nuclear power plants cost to build a nuclear power plant
gas fired power plants statistics related to nuclear energy
advantages and disadvantages of natural nuclear power plants usa





1- A- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51- 52- 53- 54- 55-