Speculators Could Drive Uranium to $55/Pound - or Higher

SUMMARY: TradeTech LLC Chief Executive Genemarket at the time. Basically, you reached a point
Clark talked with StockInterview about the uraniumwhere the cheap stuff has been sold. Now, we have
bull market, where his price models show uraniumto actually spend some money, some capital, to build
prices heading and when to expect the peak of thenew facilities, new mines and new mills. That was, I
current upward cycle of the bull market. When willthink, the earliest signal of the price needing to
"hard" times again hit the uranium market, and howadjust.StockInterview: Isn't there a ton of hype
long will the trough last? And what does the futureacross all media channels about the "nuclear
hold for the uranium price? An industry insider givesrenaissance" and the demand for more nuclear
us his insights.StockInterview: When the uranium bullenergy?Gene Clark:
market began, did you foresee $40/pound uranium,First of all, all the hype about nuclear renaissance is
now that the spot price has risen above thisreally in the United States. The Chinese have had
level?Gene Clark: I don't think any of us saw $40 perplans to expand for a long time. The Japanese have
pound coming. We had price projections at the timebeen steadily adding new capacity. Koreans have
that indicated probably $25 per pound, which wouldbeen adding new capacity. Indians have been adding
be a long term equilibrium price in constant dollarnew capacity all along, all the way through this, even
terms. But, I think it was a surprise the price went upbefore we started this discussion on nuclear
so high. I think what's going, the biggest factor rightrenaissance. I think that phrase is really focused more
now, is the advent of the so called hedge funds orin the United States, which really hasn't ordered a
speculator funds and other such groups. The priceplant since 1976 or something like that. There is a
started to go up, and they came into the marketboom. Maybe it's the uranium
with the express purpose of buying for holding andrenaissance.StockInterview: Is all of what we've been
then selling into the market later to realize the tradingreading just plain hype?Gene Clark: There is some
profit. In 2005, the hedge funds were responsible forhype, but there is also some substance. A part of it
purchasing about 10 million pounds of the 29 millionis certainly a change in public attitude about nuclear
pounds purchased. I think the market is now finallypower. If I was riding on an airplane, ten years ago,
adjusting to the realities of primary supply andand someone asked me what I did for a living, I was
demand. It's been a depressed market for 20 or 30guaranteed to have a lousy trip, arguing about
years, primarily from the draw down of excessnuclear power. When I mention it now, I get a
inventories, and what we call secondarypositive response. There's been a marked shift in
supply.StockInterview: Will the speculators remainpublic attitude about nuclear power. From the
active in driving the spot uranium price higher?Genestandpoint of the utilities that would be ordering
Clark: I think there is still some room for furthernuclear plants. To the extent that they need new
speculation activity. Uranium Participation Corporation,capacity, looking at nuclear now is not off the
for example, is rumored to be about to come to thedrawing boards, partly because of public attitude. The
equities market again to raise funds for anotherindustry has been moving through this trough period,
purchase. They're asking for authority to buy UF6, aspreparing itself for a new era. It remains to be seen
well as U308, and different forms of uranium thanwhen the first order comes. But when the first actual
they were locked into before. Whether it be at theorder of a nuclear power plant, along with the license
10 million pound level (size of purchase), I think it kindapplication does come, I think you'll see several U.S.
of depends on where the market goes. If it tends toutilities following, probably five utilities very actively
flatten out, then I think there's going to be obviouslyinvolved.StockInterview: When will that actually
less interest on their part. When they were active inhappen?Gene Clark: I think it will come within the
the market, they, of course, wanted the price to gonext five years, the ordering process. Of course it
up. Therefore, they weren't too careful about whatwill be probably another eight years before we
they paid for uranium. I think that's a part of it. In theactually see the first power plant from that process.
long run, it was due for a readjustment to reflectWe're talking probably about 13 years. That's how
prices of the cost of new production facilities. But,long it takes. You can actually construct one in 48
the hedge funds came in and overdrove the market.months, but you have to have been through the
Eventually, what it's going to wind up doing is, if theylicensing. If you don't believe the anti-nuclear people
sell off, it could have the impact of driving pricesare going to be psyched up to fight the first plant
back down below where they would otherwise havecoming through, then you'd be very naïve. The
gone.StockInterview: Did the speculators interferefirst one is going to be more difficult and take more
with the trading efficiency of the uraniumtime, I think.StockInterview: One anti-nuclear group
market?Gene Clark: In theory, speculators come in,told us they do not believe we'll have more nuclear
tend to take the risk and smooth out market prices.power plants in the United States.Gene Clark: That's
But, it never really works out that way. They alwayspossible, but given the current circumstances, my
come in and only take the risk, if there's anguess is we will have more nuclear plants. We need
opportunity to make money. So some people makethe capacity, whether we're going to build coal plants
a lot of money. It does tend to upset the market. If(or other types of power generating plants). I just
you get away from the primary users of uranium andcame from California, moved here (to North Carolina)
primary producers of uranium as your marketsix months ago. They were talking in California about
participants, then you tend to introduce more noisebuilding gas-fired plants for base load generation,
than you would like.StockInterview: With that in mind,which is the most ridiculous thing you can imagine.
in which direction are your price projectionsThe plants are cheap to build, but the fuel cost is
going?Gene Clark: We're actually updating our uraniumexorbitant. I did a speech a couple of years ago,
price forecast right now. We haven't decided on ahaving looked at the Energy Information
reference case yet. The reference cases we'reAdministration's projections of gas demand. All the
looking at will peak at about $50 to $55 per pound ingrowth in natural gas demand is going to be in the
about three years, and will then drop off prettyelectric utility sector. We are going to be importing 60
drastically. It has to do with a selling of the speculatorpercent of our gas supplies by 2020. Does that make
reserves, the uranium that's being held (forany sense? No. We have a lot of coal, but there are
speculative purposes). I can see it coming back downlots of complaints about coal burning. In our state of
to $30, maybe below $30 per pound. Then, in theNorth Carolina, the attorney general is actually suing
long run - out through 2020 - getting easily back upthe Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for the
over $40 per pound.StockInterview: Are youdamage from coal burning of the TVA's power plants
predicting a down cycle during the course of thein the adjacent state, in Tennessee. There's going to
uranium bull market?Gene Clark: Yes. It's prettybe continued pressure on coal burning. I think nuclear
consistent with everything we're doing with thehas as good a shot as any in terms of new
changes in requirements, in different cases of high,capacity.StockInterview: Some critics have argued
low, and medium demand. Our modeling system isChina and India will not be able to afford the massive
projecting this. It has to do with the supply andnuclear power plant build up they've envisioned.Gene
demand balance and the cost on the margin. TheClark: If you think the Chinese are going to have any
way to describe it is that prices have come to aproblem financing things, you'd better think twice.
point now of higher than we would have projectedLet's focus on India. India is a clear case where, and
them to be, such that over-supply is going to evolve.it is a good rule of thumb, one percent growth in
The large low cost projects will reach a point wheregross domestic product requires one percent growth
supply then overshoots demand for a few years,in electricity requirement. For India to grow
which causes the price to come back down. Theneconomically, it needs electric power. Where are they
demand growth, in the long run, picks up and puts agoing to get it? They have coal plants there, as well.
lot of pressure on the supply market to be able toOnce you use up all your hydro capacity, you really
meet the demand. So you wind up with pressuredon't have much to choose from, except coal, natural
toward the end of the period.StockInterview: But thegas, and nuclear. To the extent that they can have
markets are finicky, filled with variables, and caneconomic growth and export income, coming into
frequently trick price models.Gene Clark: Here's whattheir country, they would be able to finance nuclear
it would take to shoot that down: We have apower plants. My guess is they're going to get the
problem with small numbers, and there are somevendors of the nuclear plant to help finance
very large projects - Cigar Lake, for example. Thethem.StockInterview: Are you talking about the
expansion of Olympic Dam in Australia would be goingFrench?Gene Clark: Framatome - the company that
from about 12 million pounds of production to overconstructs the nuclear plants. Financing is generally
30 million pounds, if they finish. If you shift that outpart of the package. The first plants in China were
by four or five years, or if the owner decides, "No,basically financed by the French government. If the
we're not going to expand at all," you have a drasticFrench go into India, you'll see the same thing. The
effect. Then you would wind up with $100 per poundRussians have financed plants for developing
uranium, I think.StockInterview: What are yourcountries. That's not unusual for them to do. The
estimates on the peak price years and the bottomUnited States may, or may not, get involved. I think
years?Gene Clark: A lot of things could change, butthere have been some types of guarantees in the
here is what we're looking at. In one case scenario,past, but not at the same level as the Russians and
the speculators are really going to stay out of theFrench do it. I think those are the big choices. I
market and holding onto their stuff for a long time. Ifwouldn't be surprised to see the South Koreans
so, then we're going to be at the peak by the endinvolved in the reactor export market. They've
of this year. If they stay active in the market andpretty much developed their own technology now.
buying, then that stretches it out further. DependingThey have the capability of building 100 percent of a
on the scenario, we see the peak possibly at 2008 ornuclear power plant in South Korea: the pressure
so. I would say we're looking at a trough around thevessels, all the steel requirements. They can do it all.
timeframe of 2011 to 2013. Then back up afterWe really haven't seen them export yet, because
that.StockInterview: How do you arrive at yourthey've used up all their manufacturing capacity for
weekly numbers for the spot uranium price?Genetheir own program. At some stage, I wouldn't be
Clark: We get our data from all of the key sources:surprised to see that happen. And I think they would
the utility fuel managers, sales staff and managementbe able to finance reactor export
of uranium producers and processors, and uraniumsales.StockInterview: How are the U.S. utilities going
traders, brokers and asset managers. Some are, ofto fare in getting their "share" of uranium to fuel our
course, more cooperative than others, and whom wedomestic nuclear power plants in the context of the
call depends on the type of information we areapparent overwhelming Asian demand?Gene Clark: In
seeking. Since our price indicators are a judgment call,reality, the U.S. utilities, which tend to wait longer to
we often focus on the losers in particular recentcontract, may be the ones on the losing end because
transactions, as those will be the next to makethe Chinese and the Indians will contract early. The
offers in the market.StockInterview: Let's back up aimplication of current group-think is that the Chinese
bit. Why has uranium gone up past the levels of theand Indians are not going to be able to find enough
"cost of production," which would place the spoturanium for their new plants. But, they are
price between $25 and $35/pound?Gene Clark: Thecommitting for supplies way out into the future.
biggest factor, in signaling the market, was whenWhen the U.S. utilities come to the market, they're
utilities went out for long term bid requests. Theygoing to look around say, "Oh blankety- blank, what
found they reached a period in which producershappened? Where's the uranium?" They'll be the ones
would have to build new facilities. Producers buildingthat sat around. I think that is what's going to
those facilities felt, "I have to make at least enoughhappen unless things really change in the way
profit to cover a return on the construction costs forcontracting is done in the United States.James Finch
these facilities." That was much higher than thecontributes to and other publications.