Nuclear Power and Iran Today

Why should Iran not be trusted with Nuclear power,that reinforce the idea that Iran's sovereignty or
which may lead to nuclear weapons? Is Iran breakingrights are being challenged, however, are likely to
the NPT in any way?backfire. The result of such measures would likely be
The U.S. Government defines its areas ofincreased support for the unpopular regime in Tehran.
objectionable Iranian behavior as the following:The only possible exception might be targeting
--Iranian efforts to acquire nuclear weapons andleaders in Tehran for direct penalties such as travel
other weapons of mass destruction;bans, economic sanctions, including money and
--Its support for and involvement in internationalproperty outside of Tehran, and even restrictions on
terrorism;the ability of their family members to travel or attend
--Its support for violent opposition to the Middle Eastwestern schools. These might have some value in
peace process; andmaking the decision makers in Iran feel the affects
--Its dismal human rights record.of their actions, but are not necessarily enough to
In other words, Iran has not demonstrated itself toconvince them to change their nuclear behavior.
be a responsible international player, and certainly notIn the end, however, the United States and its allies
one to be trusted with nuclear power.must also think of what alternatives they are willing
On the second point: "In some ways, the challengeto provide to Tehran should it decide to change
Iran poses to the nuclear nonproliferation regime iscourse. While not a democracy, Iran is still a highly
even more daunting. Although the evidence - includingpolitical country and any viable solution to the
Iran almost 20 years of hiding all its nuclear fuel cyclestandoff must include some way for decision makers
efforts - clearly indicates a weapons program, itin Iran to justify their decision publicly. To be sure, it
continues to argue that its program is exclusively forwould be preferred if the United States could find a
peaceful purposes. On September 24, the IAEAsolution that would both end Iran's nuclear ambitions
Board of Governors found that Iran violated itsand weaken the regime, but such a compromise is
safeguards obligations. This finding requires a reportunlikely to emerge unless the international landscape
to the United Nations Security Council. The Securitychanges significantly. Offering Iran the ability to
Council will not replace the IAEA effort, but reinforcebenefit from other forms of nuclear technology
it - for example, by calling on Iran to cooperate withincluding the possible sale by Russia of additional
the IAEA, and giving the IAEA new, needednuclear power plants might end up being an important
authority to investigate all Iranian weaponizationpart of any political compromise.
efforts. We continue to work with other IAEA BoardOn the military side, the chances of a U.S. strike
members on the timing and content of the report ofagainst Iran soon are probably unlikely. Reasons
Iranian noncompliance to the Security Council. Weinclude the fact that the U.S. military is already
also continue to support the efforts of the Unitedstretched thin, the virtual certitude that much of
Kingdom, France and Germany - the EU-3 - to bringIran's secret nuclear program would not be detected
Iran back to the negotiations."and destroyed, the likelihood that a military attack
The operative wording here is: "The IAEA Board ofwould turn a pro-U.S. Iranian population against us and
Governors found that Iran violated its safeguardstoward the regime, and the negative reactions likely
obligations." Certainly, the evidence suggests Tehranto come from the international community.
is in violation of the NPT.Experts are now talking about "containment" of Iran
Will the US Military do something about the nuclearalong the lines of our containment of the Soviet
weapon in Iran? The following selected commentaryUnion during the Cold War. While not ideal and also
from the Center for International and Strategicprotracted, such a policy may be our only recourse
Studies: Diplomatic or economic penalties by the U.N.for the foreseeable future.