Nuclear Power & Politics - Is Sustainable Living Debatable?

Neither McCain nor Obama oppose nuclear power,and it has to be carefully looked after for several
their differences of opinion aren't on the backgroundthousand years (10,000 years according to United
facts of nuclear power, but on impact on theStates Environmental Protection Agency standards).
environment. McCain focuses on an aggressiveAnd what happens if nuclear waste falls into the
expansion of nuclear power plants, while Obamawrong hands?
focuses nuclear power playing a only a part of the- Despite extremely high security standards, it is
overall energy portfolio.technically impossible to build a facility that is 100%
McCain is campaigning for "cheap, clean, securesecure and accidents can still happen. The
energy for America" and the need to "transformconsequences of an accident would be absolutely
electricity" through nuclear power. Nuclear power is adevastating both for human beings as for the
proven, reliable, zero-emission source of energy, andenvironment. The more nuclear power plants (and
he is campaigning that it is time to recommit tonuclear waste storage shelters) that are built, the
advancing our use of nuclear power. McCain alsohigher the probability of a disastrous failure (and/or
supports the idea that nuclear power is a majorterrorist attack) somewhere in the world.
contender in climate control.- The energy source for nuclear energy is Uranium,
Obama on the other hand, is adamant about the factwhich is a scarce resource; its supply is estimated to
that nuclear energy is not optimal. He has statedlast only for the next 30 to 60 years depending on
that, "there are no silver bullet solutions to ourthe actual demand.
energy crises. Our economy, security andIt is equally important to look seriously at
environment will be best served through a sustainedsustainability; is nuclear energy sustainable? For
effort to diversify our energy sources." Obama hasseveral reasons, nuclear power is neither {green} nor
not ruled nuclear power out, but only as long as itssustainable:
clean and safe.- Both nuclear waste and retired nuclear plants are a
The researchers at Paradise Earth decided to take alife-threatening legacy for future generations.
closer look at the impact that nuclear powerSustainability is blatantly contradicted if generations to
generation will have on, not only our economy, butcome have to deal with dangerous waste generated
also our environment. How would constructing thesefrom preceding generations.
nuclear power plants benefit our troubled nation?- Uranium, the source of energy for nuclear power, is
- Nuclear power technology is already in the worksavailable on earth only in limited quantities. Uranium is
and operating throughout the world, so anbeing consumed during the operation of the nuclear
investment in research and development won't bepower plant so it won't be available any more for
necessary.future generations. This again contradicts the principle
- Nuclear power generation emits somewhat lowof sustainability.
levels of carbon dioxide; the contribution of nuclearThe debate over nuclear power plants has been
power plants to global warming is minimal.going on for decades, worldwide. Politicians, activists,
- One single plant can produce high levels of electricalenvironmentalists and the average citizen cannot
energy.longer turn a blind eye to the consequences of our
But at what cost?existence on Planet Earth. Our future and the survival
- Radioactive waste is still an unsolved problem. Theof our natural resources depend solely on our ability
waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerousto support sustainable living.