Surprise! Coal & Nuclear Power are Keys to Obama’s Energy Plan

[Editor's Note: This is the eighth installment of ournation’s energy mix with more wind, solar and
“Outlook 2009” series, which looks at theother renewable sources.
global investing outlook for the New Year.] 
President-elect Barack Obama has made no bones"That’s sort of like my wife saying she’d
about wanting to jump-start the renewable energysupport divorce under certain situations," says William
markets – pledging $150 billion for theKovacs, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s vice
development of biofuels, solar and wind power, otherpresident of environment, technology, and public
alternative energy sources during his first term.affairs.
But what might the new administration mean for 
more traditional – and more reliable –energyIn fact, the Barack Obama/Joe Biden New Energy
sources?for America Plan, while recognizing that nukes provide
Oil is always the first energy source to spring to70% of our non-carbon-generated electricity, says
mind. But it’s hardly a solo act – coal andthat “before an expansion of nuclear power is
nuclear make up the other two-thirds of the top fuelconsidered, key issues must be addressed including:
trio. Coal delivers 50% of U.S. electricity needs, andsecurity of nuclear fuel and waste, waste storage
nuclear power brings another 20% to the table.and proliferation.” It goes on to say that the
The cold truth is that demand for energy of all typesteam of President-elect Obama and incoming Vice
– and especially electricity – is going to keepPresident Joe Biden “do not believe that Yucca
advancing, domestically and worldwide. AndMountain is a suitable site as a long-term repository
developing alternatives to coal and nuclear will takefor spent nuclear designed for long-term storage. In
time. For instance, tying wind and solar into theany case, the earliest the storage site could open
existing power grid will be enormously expensive andwould be 2017, and that was before Republicans lost
is likely to pose massive technical and engineeringcontrol of the Senate.
problems. 
In fact, according to the International EnergyWith Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.,
Agency, renewable energy isn’t likely to make afirmly opposed to nuclear waste storage in his home
meaningful dent in meeting the world’s energystate – and with the Obama administration ready
needs before 2030, if then.to hold the industry’s feet to the regulatory fire
And regardless where the power comes from, our– any plans to expand the nuclear industry in the
appetite for electricity will continue to skyrocket.United States now face a high hurdle.
Across the planet, overall electricity consumption is 
expected to double by 2030, increasing by 17 trillionBut nuclear proponents are hardly impotent. The
kilowatt hours. While electricity demand willNuclear Energy Institute, the industry’s most
“only” increase by 50% in the U.S. market bypowerful lobbying group, helped craft the Energy
2030, demand will increase 400% in China and six-foldPolicy Act of 2005 with more than $12 billion in
in India.subsidies for nukes.
Our research indicates that President Obama will have 
very little flexibility in solving our short-term energyMaintaining nuclear energy’s current 20% share
problems once he’s sworn into office nextof generation would require building three reactors
month. While he may prefer the environmentallyevery two years starting in 2016, based on U.S.
friendly alternatives, most of those replacements areDepartment of Energy forecasts. Right now, some
far from fully developed.17 companies and consortia are pursuing licenses for
The bottom line: Obama’s apparent preferencemore than 30 nuclear power plants with the Nuclear
for renewable energy aside, coal and nuclear powerRegulatory Commission.
are fully deployed, and in widespread use, meaning 
they’ll remain the backbone of our energy sectorBut the last operating license for a nuclear plant in the
in the New Year – and for years to come.United States was issued in 1978, and the approval
process takes a minimum of 24 months after site
Even so, it’s well worth factoring in all theapproval, which can take years. Expect lots of public
possible players as we examine energy-sectorcomment and infighting in Washington, as applications
outlook – and the accompanying potential profitwind their way through the approval process at the
plays – for the next 12 months. King Coal ReignsNRC.
Supreme 
When it comes to future energy profits forMeanwhile, the rest of the world is racing ahead with
investors, coal and nuclear will continue to be theplans to up the ante in the nuclear power game.
“dream team” for years to come. Coal willThere are currently 440 nuclear reactors in 31
provide the answer to our short-term andcountries that generate about 16% of the
intermediate energy needs. It’s plentiful, it’sworld’s electricity.
cheaper than other available alternatives, and a big 
percentage of the world’s power plants burn it.Uranium-fueled nuclear energy is rapidly gaining global
Nuclear power offers a long-term solution to energyacceptance as a clean, reliable alternative to such
shortages and a clean solution to global warming, asdirty-burning fossil fuels as coal and oil. In a twin bid
well. Uranium-fueled nuclear plants are cheap toto combat global warming and keep up with soaring
operate, can run for long periods without refueling,demand for electricity, countries are rushing to build
and cause little pollution.nuclear power plants. Under current projections, 630
While there is widespread distaste for coal-firedreactors will be operating in 55 countries by 2030.
power plants that spew billions of tons of carbon 
dioxide and other pollutants into the air, there’sIt’s the new technologies those reactors are
no doubt coal will continue to be the dominant playerdesigned around that are aimed at allaying the
in the electricity game for some time to come.public’s perception about the safety of nuclear
A full 50% of the electricity U.S. consumers use ispower. Toshiba Plant & System Services, which
generated by coal, and coal is king in the rest of thehas built 112 plants in the past 12 years (more than
world, as well. According to the IEA, coal accountedany other company), is working on a
for 42% of all worldwide electricity consumption in“mininuke,” according to Forbes magazine.
2005.Called the “4S” (short for Super-Safe, Small
But get this – the agency predicts coal use willand Simple), it uses a bath of molten sodium to
explode by 73% over the next 20 years. That’sproduce steam twice as hot as steam from
the largest projected percentage increase of allwater-cooled reactors. The 4S can crank out as
energy sources.much as 50 megawatts of power, easily enough to
As you might suspect, China and India use 45% offire up a small factory, or to service an entire town
world’s coal and will be responsible for 80% ofthat’s located off the main power grid.
that increase. China, alone, uses more coal than the 
United States, Japan and Europe combined. China isOn top of that, the mininuke can go 30 years
utterly dependent on coal to run its factories andwithout refueling, as opposed to typical reactors,
assembly plants, with coal supplying 80% of itswhich must be fed every 18 months. And the 4S will
electricity. The Red Dragon also is the world’sbe safer, because the reactor core is deep
top producer of steel, a process that’s also a bigunderground, well protected against a terrorist attack
burner of coal.or earthquakes.
But while China is coal’s largest consumer and 
producer, the United States controls 27% of theChina and South Africa are working on so-called
world’s proven reserves, the biggest-single“pebble-bed reactors,” one version of which
percentage on the planet. That puts this countryis filled with 100,000 billiard-ball-sized spheres of
front and center on the worldwide coal stage, andcoated uranium that are cooled by helium. That
President-elect Obama’s energy policy in theeliminates the need for enormous pressurized
spotlight.water-cooling systems and million-dollar containment
The president plays a pivotal role in shaping thedomes, making them virtually meltdown-proof.
nation’s energy policy, naming top officials at the 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), theU.S. firms are also on the trail of smaller and safer
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation anddesigns. A Santa Fe, NM company called Hyperion
Enforcement and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Power Generation Inc., is working on a hot-tub sized
Obama has proposed an economy-widedesign, which eliminates the need for the notoriously
cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions byunstable uranium control rods. U.S. giant General
80% by 2050. His system – which would set anElectric Co. (GE) is working on new, more efficient
overall emissions limit, then require polluters to buydesigns, as well.
allowances at public auction – would increase 
electricity rates and discourage coal consumption inNo matter how you slice it, the fuel for the reactors
the U.S. market. President-elect Obama even hasin those plants all depend on a scarce commodity
stated that any utilities building coal-fired plants could– uranium. Flat out, there’s just not enough
go bankrupt buying pollution allowances.“yellow cake” to go around. It takes seven
And on Capitol Hill, newly emboldened Democratsto 10 years to transform a uranium discovery into a
recently tackled global warming and otherfully operational mine. With that kind of lag time,
environmental problems by choosing Sen. Henryit’s clearly almost impossible for supply to keep
Waxman, D-Calif., to head the House ofup with demand.
Representative’s Energy and Commerce panel. 
Waxman has already signed onto legislation thatUntil recently, the market reflected the scarcity, rising
would ban any new coal-fired power plants thatas high as $137 a pound in 2007. But lately, despite
aren’t built using new technologies that capturethe global shortages, uranium prices – in
carbon dioxide and store it underground, a key partsympathy with other commodity prices – have
of the Obama energy plan.nosedived.
Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining 
Association, said he believes Obama will be pragmaticPrices have fallen 40% this year, leading to a sharp
about the need to keep coal in the nation’sdecline in the share prices of mining companies, and
energy mix.eviscerating the financing for extraction projects. In
 the last month alone, six uranium mines in western
 Colorado and Utah were either put on hold or closed.
"He presumably would be sensitive to the impacts of 
energy policies given the perilous state of theSome experts lay the blame for this current credit
economy," Popovich said.squeeze squarely at the feet of hedge funds –
 who they blame for buying up uranium – and
But while U.S. utilities may eventually be forced tobanks no longer willing to lend money.
tighten emissions rules and increase rates, 
Obama’s renewable energy plans will have very“Hedge funds were selling off their uranium to
little impact on U.S. coal producers in the near future.raise cash, and the prices just plunged,” said
 George E.L. Glasier, chief executive officer of Energy
The world needs coal. We have it. And we’reFuels Inc., a Canadian junior miner that recently put a
going to sell it.Colorado mine project on hold as part of a
 “capital preservation” strategy brought on by
In the first half of 2008, U.S. coal exports increasedthe credit crunch.
by 13 million short tons, or 50%, over first-half 2007 
shipments, according to the IEA. Strong globalUranium prices fell to $75 early this year, and fell as
demand for coal, combined with supply disruptions inlow as $44 this fall. The spot price now is $55.
several key coal exporting countries (Australia, South 
Africa and China), were the primary factors behindWith the worldwide growth in the industry – and
the increase.a classic supply/demand imbalance in the making
 – someone is eventually going to have to pay
But lately, coal prices, along with the prices of otherthe price. History shows when uranium prices move
fossil fuels, have suffered from the global economichigher, uranium stocks almost always hitch a ride
crisis, and from a resurgent U.S. dollar. An 80%North. So when uranium prices advance – most
decline in global shipping rates has also fosteredlikely to new highs – expect mining stocks to rise
competition from other exporters, like Australia,in virtual lock step.
which can now ship farther and compete with U.S. 
exporters.But notwithstanding global growth – for now, at
 least – Obama’s energy plan and the
As a result, the price of Appalachian Coal on the Newmothballing of mines makes any uranium play a
York Mercantile Exchange (CME) has fallen to lesslong-term proposition.
than $80 a ton from $143 in July. 
 Besides Toshiba (PINK:TOSBF), the stocks to
This will have a negative impact on coal producersconsider include Cameco Corp. (CCJ), the largest U.S.
until the world economy is able to gather itself backproducer; and General Electric, which has a presence
up and build up a new head of steam.in the commercial nuclear power market here and
 overseas. Also, take a look at Rio Tinto PLC (RTP)
But don’t expect the slump to last long.and BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP), huge international mining
China’s economy is getting a shot in the armfirms with large uranium deposits. Each of these firms
from a gigantic $586 billion stimulus package,would stand to reap substantial profits from a
cementing growth expectations for 2009. Expectresurgent price in yellow cake.
U.S.exports to accelerate when that kicks in, probably  Outlook 2009 – and Beyond
in the second half of 2009. 
 However, regardless of what uranium does, coal is
Since the stock market usually leads economicstill the 800-pound gorilla in the energy world. In the
indicators by six-to-nine months, right now is a goodUnited States, no matter how lofty our
time to be looking at candidates for your investingenvironmental intentions may be, it’s unlikely coal
dollar. But you should be cautious about pulling thewill be regulated out of existence anytime soon.
trigger. Watch construction activity in China –That’s especially true overseas, where coal is
especially steel demand in the late spring – forplaying a crucial role, fueling the transformation of
the first signs of a rebound in coal prices.such countries as China and India from “emerging
 markets” into first-order powerhouse economies.
When you think things are ready to take off,Given that, the world market simply can’t
Peabody Energy Corp. (BTU) and Arch Coal Inc. (ACI)replace coal anytime soon, either.
– the largest U.S. producers – are worth a 
look. For those who like to play a basket of shares,As for nuclear power, safety improvements and
the Market Vectors Coal exchange traded fundother technological solutions make nuclear energy a
(KOL), or ETF, provides the desired diversification. Allviable energy source for the long term, eventually
three securities are trading at discounts of at leastgrabbing a bigger piece of the energy pie –
80% from their July highs, and currently trade atespecially overseas.
bargain basement multiples. 
 The bottom line: The economic outlook for both coal
If you want a coal play that bets directly on China,and nuclear power is upbeat. Investors might look at
Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Geraldboth energy plays when considering how to allocate
likes Yanzhou Coal Mining Co. Ltd. (ADR: YZC), one oftheir portfolio – for the New Year and beyond.
China’s biggest coal suppliers. It produces lots of 
high-grade, low-sulfur coal, which burns cleaner and[Editor’s Note: Money Morning’s
therefore fetches a premium price. The company“Outlook 2009” economic forecasting series
boasts profit margins of 22%, when the industrylast looked at the outlook for retail sales in the New
averages half that. The company profits are up aYear. Next up: Latin America. Check out past series
blistering 364% in the year’s first three quarters,stories, which have underscored that uncertainty will
compared with a year ago. The stock trades at onlycontinue to be the watchword for at least the first
three times earnings and has a dividend yield of 4.3%.part of the New Year. Little wonder, as the global
  Nuclear Power: It Struggles in the U.S., but Thrivesfinancial crisis continues to whipsaw the U.S. financial
Abroadmarkets in a manner that hasn’t been seen since
 the Great Depression. It’s almost enough to
Nuclear power is attractive to the energy industrymake you surrender. But what if you knew, ahead of
because it produces electricity on a predictable,time, what marketplace changes to expect? Then
24-hour basis – earning it the industry sobriquetyou’d be in the driver’s seat – right?
of “base load” power. Coal and hydroelectricYou’d know what to anticipate, could craft a
plants are the only other power sources that alsoprofit strategy to follow, and could then just sit back,
rate that label. Such alternatives as wind, solar orwatching and waiting – and finally profiting from
biofuels do not.– the very marketplace events you anticipated.
  
During its term, the Bush administration tried to sparkR. Shah Gilani – a retired hedge fund manager and
a “renaissance” in the construction of nucleara nationally known expert on the U.S. credit
power plants. And during his presidential campaign,crisis– has predicted five key financial crisis
Sen. John McCain stood firmly behind the“aftershocks” that he says will create
industry’s hopes of building 45 new reactors bysubstantial profit opportunities for investors who
2030.know just what these aftershocks are, and how to
 play them. In the Trigger Event Strategist, Gilani
Interest in new types of reactors seemed to hint atdescribes how investors can use these aftershocks,
least at the beginnings of a new start. Butor “trigger events,” as gateways to massive
President-elect Obama has been lukewarm on nuclear.profits. To find out all about these five financial-crisis
He acknowledges that nuclear is one of several viableaftershocks, and about the trigger-event profit
components of the nation’s energy portfoliostrategy they feed into, check out our latest report.]
– the current 104-plant fleet provides 20% of 
America’s electricity – but has questioned itsTo read more click here.
safety while emphasizing a need to diversify the