Ten Effective Ways to Reduce Global Warming

There are three main approaches to tacking globalRoad transport is the largest contributor to net global
warming: through policy measures, economicwarming of the human activity sectors examined in a
mechanisms and technological changes. These arerecent NASA study, therefore, this should be another
obviously interdependent and should be tackledpriority area for mitigation.
simultaneously.Despite all the technological advances in road vehicles
The two big policy elephant's in the room areto improve efficiency, the main factor determining
economic growth and population growth which drivethe fuel consumption or carbon emissions per person
consumption and the release of greenhouse gases.carried is still passenger utilisation, or how full the
Without subduing these, any attempts at mitigatingvehicle is. A typical car will need to carry
global warming through technological means alone willapproximately 20 times the weight and 100 times the
be completely undermined. We also need to replacevolume of the driver it carries. Carrying this much
the flawed economic mechanisms which have provenexcess weight and space around is an inherently
largely ineffective due to the lobbying and corruptioninefficient way of conveying people from one place
within corporations. The technological solutionsto another. Similarly, public vehicles can be even more
themselves should focus initially on the sectorsunder-utilised than cars. This situation will continue until
responsible for the greatest net warming over thea more competitive and convenient method of public
short term. This will give us time to reducetransport is found.
greenhouse gases from other sectors which willUtilisation in vehicles could be improved in two ways,
exhibit greater net warming in the longer term. Weby encouraging more people to travel in standard
now examine these in more detail.sized vehicles and reducing the size of vehicle to
POLICY ISSUESmeet a typical journey load.
1. Educate children about how to live a sustainableThe first case can be met by developing nationally
lifestylecoordinated car-sharing schemes. Here, car drivers
However, the science is just the easy part. We areare guided to their destination, via small diversions if
also inundated with the pressure to consume, whichnecessary, to collect and drop off passengers for a
makes it even more essential to avoid unsustainablefee using priority access routes such as bus lanes.
thinking habits from an early age. Children should beThis allows drivers to bypass traffic jams in the rush
taught that sustainability is not just about buyinghour and reduce their own journey times to make up
more energy efficient products, but also designing tofor the lost time in picking up passengers.
last, making full use of what we have, eating less,The second case uses small, narrow width cars with
wasting less and recycling more. Above all we needthe provision of a parallel road infrastructure. These
to teach that materialistic gain only producesvehicles might for example carry two people
temporary pleasure, and the route to genuinelengthways, seated back to back in a reclined position
happiness lies in a less competitive, moreto minimise weight and air resistance. The parallel
co-operative society with strong social ties.road infrastructure would consist of side lanes and
2. Control population through family planning, welfareunderpasses, enabling drivers to bypass bottlenecks
reforms and the empowerment of womenand reduce journey times.
The world's population is expected to increase from7. Electrify the transport network and power it from
6.8 billion in 2009, to reach 9.15 billion in 2050, withovernight nuclear electricity
most of this growth taking place in the developingBattery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) exhibit no emissions
world. Urgent measures are needed to limit globalfrom the vehicles themselves. However, emissions
population at levels which can be sustained in the longcan be generated at the power stations that
term, since our culture encourages everyone toproduce the electricity to charge their batteries, and
strive for the highest material affluence. Unrestrainedthe overall greenhouse gases emitted will be
population growth is a carbon time bomb, which isdependent on the energy generating sources used.
now only starting to take effect in South East Asia,Most studies suggest that switching from Internal
with South America and Africa soon to follow. TheCombustion (IC) engined vehicles to BEVs would
only ethical way we can achieve this potentially vastreduce carbon emissions, as well as improve local air
increase in wealthy consumers are by minimising birthquality. For cars in the UK, it is estimated that
rates.swapping from fossil fuelled to electric cars would
Population growth can be controlled through areduce their carbon emissions by more than half,
combination of measures. These include free andeven when using the current methods of electric
easy access to family planning, welfare provision togeneration. However, further reductions in carbon
encourage smaller families, and the empowerment ofcould be achieved by generating more electricity
women through education and freedom to choosefrom non-fossil fuelled sources. For example, any
their future. In practice, educated women have lessincrease in nuclear capacity would be best directed
children due to career commitments and the socialtowards powering BEVs, since these can be charged
freedom from the early responsibilities ofovernight and during other non-peak periods.
motherhood.Intermittent sources such as wind could also
Contraception is almost five times cheaper thancontribute since charging periods could be varied to
conventional green technologies as a means ofmatch the windy periods.
combating climate change. Each $7 (£4) spent onWhile BEV range is limited without resorting to
basic family planning over the next four decadesextortionately expensive batteries, most trips can be
would reduce global CO2 emissions by more than aaccommodated using relatively conventional batteries.
tonne. To achieve the same result with low-carbonCar trips in the UK involving journeys less than 80km
technologies would cost a minimum of $32 (£19).in length cover 97% of trips and 75% of total
ECONOMIC MECHANISMSdistance travelled. However, for commuter drivers,
3. Encourage reforestation and sustainable land usetrips involving journeys less than 80km in length
through a combination of economic restrictions andcover 98% of trips and 88% of the total distance
incentivestravelled. It is therefore suggested that for some
90% of deforestation is caused by unsustainablecategories of motorist at least, a basic BEV would be
agricultural practices, while the logging and plantationa practical and competitively priced proposition,
forestry play a greater role in forest degradation.especially as a second car. For longer journeys other
Tropical countries should be paid to reforest net landalternatives could be made available such as
with natural vegetation, verified via satellite imageryreplaceable SWAP modules or a ferrying system
and paid via a carbon tax from industry (see item 4).where cars are charged while being moved on a
The price should be set so it is more financiallyspecialised car transporter.
beneficial for countries to reforest and maintainElectric trucks and buses could also have their range
forest habitats than grow crops, biofuels and raiseextended by using an electrified guided trackway,
cattle. This system would be far more effective thanbuilt from underused parts of the rail network.
present financial instruments such as negotiable caps8. Introduce more incentives for improving energy
and less susceptible to manipulation since theefficiency in the housing sector
reforestation would be genuinely additional. HigherHome insulation grants are available in many countries
latitude countries could be included in this scheme ifespecially for those on social benefits. However, the
the combined affect of the carbon absorption andrate of implementation is very slow, and requires
albedo change from forestation reduces net heatinitiative on part of the property owner to act, so
gain in these locations.these measures will inevitably be delayed through
Further carbon reductions in our biofuel and foodapathy and inertia. This process could be speeded up
chain can be made through changes in our farmingusing the following methods.
practices, such as using crop rotation, no tillAll property owners should qualify for free water
agriculture, and appropriate fertiliser use. Thesetank, loft and cavity wall insulation and draught
practices would also reduce pollution in rivers andproofing. This should be heavily marketed to those
reduce the degradation of the coastal ecosystemswho have not already installed these measures. The
that help to absorb carbon.costs should be borne by a government interest free
4. Introduce a carbon tax and sustainability index forloan payable on the fuel bill for the property
businessesremaining with any new owner. If the repayment
Corporations are fond of publicising their greenperiod is sufficiently long this should generate a
credentials, however, these often consist of isolatedcontinuous saving.
initiatives with only a limited environmental impact onLess cost effective retrofit measures such as
their business as a whole. It remains the norm forexternal cladding, internal wall insulation, heat pumps,
organisations to use energy inefficient offices andcondensing boilers, thermally efficient glazing panels
send their employees to conferences and meetingsand solar heating could be similarly encouraged, by
that could easily have been accomplished throughthe same mechanism, although a low interest loan
teleconferencing. Even some businesses which adviseshould be used instead. On the other hand the least
on sustainability issues are almost indistinguishablecost-effective technologies should only qualify for this
from their clients in this respect. These companiesincentive if they could demonstrate an economic
hardly provide a good example!payback period without the use of heavy subsidies.
To avoid this greenwashing all companies should payThis might vary from location to location depending
a carbon tax. This would allow for the carbonon the local environmental conditions.
released from heating and cooling their buildings and9. Match supply and demand from sustainable energy
the fuel used during their employees commuting andgenerating systems
business travel. These figures should be calculableIn a desperate attempt to meet renewable energy
from energy and fuel bill receipts, and require onlycommitments, certain EU countries have engaged in
limited additional administrative effort. The monieswidespread installations of large wind farms. While
collected could then be used to fund cost effectivethese can make a useful contribution to the
carbon mitigation projects such as reforestation,electricity grid, and can be economically justified if
population control and biochar sequestration.situated in the correct locations, their usefulness is
The carbon emitted from each company could alsoheavily compromised by their intermittency and
be expressed as a sustainability index in terms of theunpredictability of output. Wind generation requires
carbon emitted per employee hour and company100% standby capacity from conventional fuelled
turnover. This could be prominently displayed on thegenerators during calm periods, this renders the
corporate literature to ensure each company's truewhole grid system more expensive to operate since
commitment and environmental credentials can bethe efficiency of conventional plants are
judged with respect to other similar organisations, atcompromised by switching them on and off to meet
least in terms of carbon emissions. Governmentthe variability in supply of the renewable contribution.
contracts could also ascribe priority to firms who fallThese problems can be reduced somewhat by
within carbon intensity guidelines, although there mayinstalling a continent-wide high voltage grid which can
be other environmental and ethical issues to betransfer electricity from remote areas where the
considered in this choice.wind is blowing, and using stores of hydro electricity
However, this system would not take full account ofand other renewable's when available. However, the
the environmental externalities of the products beingdisparity between supply and demand will remain
purchased for the business; this could be betterproblematic unless other initiatives are used.
addressed through taxes on imports from countriesOne solution would be to use wind generated
that do not apply these criteria, and regulatingelectricity to power heat pumps for space heating in
practices which contribute to waste, such as foodall new build properties, and in particular offices.
pricing and packaging. While this accounting procedureThese buildings would be designed to use the thermal
is far from perfect, it is far more important thatinertia of the walls, ground and underlying foundations
carbon calculations should be kept as explicit and asas a heat store, so heat is retained during calm
simple as possible to avoid 'creative accounting' andperiods when there is only limited wind generation
corrupt practices.capacity. Hence the variable electricity generated
TECHNOLOGIESfrom wind farms is effectively stored and released
5. Use of biochar stoves for burning biomassas heat helping to match the disparity between
Domestic biomass combustion is the second greatestsupply and demand.
contributor to net global warming after transport.Existing installations with air conditioning could also use
This is partially caused by the black carbon emissionsheat pumps powered from electricity, but employ
(part of smoke) released from burning this source.natural gas heating as a contingency during the
The atmospheric residence time of black carbon iscalmer spells. It may also be possible to use hybrid
only a few weeks, while CO2 emissions resides in thegas and electric heat pumps to generate combined
atmosphere for more than a century, so reducingheat and power (see a later article on this). These
black carbon emissions could quickly reduce climateinitiatives would help to smooth out supply and
forcing along with any potential feedback effects.demand and allow wind farms to be more
Therefore, this is probably the most cost effectiveeconomically used.
short term mitigation strategy available to us.10. Ensure new power plants are carbon capture
Biomass is commonly used for cooking in developingready
countries, often on open stoves producing substantialThe inexorable increase in world demand for energy
smoke which can cause health problems, especially ifis disconcerting. China is increasing its electricity
used indoors. Between 25 and 35 percent of thegeneration capacity by about 14% per year and has
worlds black carbon from biomass comes from Chinabecome the worlds largest direct emitter of carbon
and India alone.emissions, partially due to the widespread use of
However, there is a smokeless method of burninghigh-carbon emitting coal fired powered stations. To
biomass which has other benefits as well. If biomassget this into perspective, Germany's entire electricity
is heated without the presence of air, it releases thecapacity of photovoltaics is equivalent to only 0.8%
smokeless, combustible gases methane andof China's increase in electricity generation per year
hydrogen, leaving a carbon or charcoal residue.(based on calculations using data here and here)
Specially constructed biochar stoves can use thisTo stand any realistic chance of reducing carbon
principle for cooking. The remaining biochar oremissions, it is essential that we develop carbon
charcoal left in the stove can be sequestered in thecapture and sequestration technologies for fossil
soil to lock away the carbon, or processed into afuelled power stations and industry on a large scale.
fertiliser. This biochar could be sold on by localHowever until we get these into operation, all new
communities, paid by a carbon tax on industrialindustrial units should be capable of being retrofitted
emissions as described in item 4.with carbon capture technology and built near
Modern biochar production can also be industrialised inlocations where the carbon dioxide can be stored.
processes that may produce 3 to 9 times moreCarbon sequestration and capture is neither the most
energy than invested. However, it would be essentialpopular, cheapest or the fastest acting option
to ensure that the biomass was obtained from aavailable, but this technology must be developed and
sustainable resource and the commodity value is setinstalled as quickly as possible to give us at least a
at a level so it doesn't encourage deforestation.chance of controlling carbon from these plants;
6. Utilise vehicles more effectively and allow them tootherwise the developed world efforts at carbon
use a priority access infrastructuremitigation will be heavily compromised.