What if Iran Says No? (Part 2)

July 29, 2006facilities.
Almost two months ago, when European UnionWhich brings us back to the original question. What if
Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana presented anIran rejects the package of incentives and continues
incentives package to Iran to encourage the Islamicits uranium enrichment program, effectively telling the
Republic to curb its nuclear activities, I wrote arest of the world to mind its own business and stop
column questioning what, if anything, the worldinfringing on Iran's national rights?
community would do in the event that Iran rejectedThe United Nations will inevitably bog down in its own
the proposal. In that column, I argued that Iran, inincompetence and no significant agreement among
responding that the package of incentives requiredthe permanent members will be reached. A
further study, was probably stalling for time while itnuclear-armed Iranian regime is a threat to the entire
continued its program without international oversight.region, a threat that Israel cannot ignore. Will Prime
Responding to the August 22nd date put forth byMinister Olmert authorize a strike similar to the Israeli
the Iranian government for a formal reply to theattack on Iraqi nuclear facilities at Osirak in 1981?
package, many countries, including the United StatesEven if he wanted to, he would probably be
and Great Britain, declared the date unacceptable,restrained by the United States government in the
citing a maximum period of weeks, rather thaninterest of preventing further destabilization in the
months, for Iran to agree to suspend the enrichmentarea.
of uranium and join in multilateral talks about itsWill the United States and Great Britain take matters
nuclear future.into their own hands, either through sanctions or
However, the international community, in the form ofmilitary action? Independently enforced sanctions are
the United Nations, has been unable to reach anprobably a safe bet, but direct military action is not
agreement on the course of action to be pursued inlikely. The Anglo-American alliance is working diligently
order to press Iran on its nuclear ambitions. We arewith the Iranians in an attempt to quell the violence in
now at the end of July and the only thing that hasIraq by putting pressure on the Shiite militias that are
been accomplished to date is a draft resolutionengaging in the recent surge in sectarian fighting.
requiring Iran to suspend uranium enrichment activitiesWhile the United States and England are certainly
by the end of August or face possible sanctions.capable of executing a military strike against Iranian
Iranian state radio is already reporting that such atargets, despite concerns about their commitments in
resolution will be rejected and Iran will not be subjectAfghanistan and Iraq, such a use of force would do
to international demands.more to increase tensions in the Middle East than it
In setting a deadline, the members of the Securitywould to alleviate those tensions. A military strike
Council are seeking to send the message that theywould only add to the anti-American and anti-British
are united and they are serious. But as history hassentiment in a region already torn apart by hatred
repeatedly shown us, rarely are the five permanentand violence.
members of the Council anything close to resemblingThe end result is likely to be some form of
united, or serious.accommodation on the nuclear program, with a
Time and again, the United States, Great Britain,promise of additional influence on Iraqi Shiites from
China, France and Russia find themselves at oddsthe Iranian regime, along with some form of
over competing economic and security interests. Justinternational monitoring of Iranian nuclear progress. In
the threat of a veto can stall action and prevent aexchange, western nations will fulfill their pledges in
matter from ever coming to a vote before thethe incentives package, including easing current
Council. Consensus on serious matters is seldomsanctions, assisting with WTO membership, and
achieved, and I expect more of the same withupgrading the Iranian air fleet.
regard to the Iranian nuclear program.That will set the stage for more negotiations and
There is little reason to expect the Iranian regime tomore concessions from both sides. But in the end, I
accept the proposal to stop their nuclear agenda. Thefear that we will see a radical regime dedicated to
leadership in Tehran knows what everyone elsethe destruction of Israel and a sworn enemy of the
knows, that there is little likelihood of any meaningfulUnited States in possession of nuclear weapons. As
sanctions coming out of the Security Council, andlong as the international community lacks the will to
there is absolutely no possibility of a resolutioncome together in the face of real threats, we should
authorizing military action against Iranian nuclearall be concerned about what happens if Iran says no.