Why Non-Renewable Energy Sources Are Not Effective

Non-renewable energy sources are not effective, andfound to avert an energy crisis and supply the
cost far more than they offer in benefits. Fossil fuelsenergy needed. Crude oil is full of hydrocarbons, and
formation is a very long process that occurs overboth the crude and refined forms of this substance
thousands of years, and the reserves left in thecontribute greatly to pollution and global warming
earth are running out. Developing countries, includingincreases. This energy source is not renewable, which
China and India, are requiring more energy and oil, andmeans gasoline and diesel will not be fuel sources
this means what fossil fuel reserves are left will soonmuch longer. Because fossil fuels are not renewable,
be gone. Because of the time fossil fuel formationthey can not be replaced. Removing these resources
takes in the earth, it can not be renewed fordamages the earth, and new oil fields are getting
thousands of years.harder to find every year. Anyone who understands
There are many hot discussions about pros and conshow petroleum engineers find new oil fields knows
of nuclear power, and there are many critics andthe extended amount of time and large amounts of
proponents for this form of energy. No matter howmoney this process requires.
safe these operations are handled and barring anyAnyone who knows about the coal mining industry
nuclear accident, which is almost impossible to do,also knows why coal is also not the answer to future
radioactive waste is created which will be dangerousenergy needs. Just like crude oil and natural gas, coal
for hundreds or even thousands of years. This leavesis a fossil fuel which is not renewable and harms the
a toxic legacy for future generations to clean up.environment significantly. Mining for coal has changed
Nuclear power is very risky, and can have disastrousa lot over the years, but recovering this resource still
consequences when something goes wrong. Incidentsdoes great damage to the earth through mining
like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island have made manymethods, as well as greenhouse emissions. Coal is not
wary of allowing a nuclear power plant anywhereunlimited, and eventually this fossil fuel will also run
near their city. When all pros and cons are taken intoout as well. Since coal is a nonrenewable energy
consideration anything as deadly as nuclear energysource, it is not a viable solution to any future energy
should probably not be used. This energy is notcrisis.
renewable either, because there is a limited amountWithout alternative energy sources, a severe energy
of Uranium in the earth, so when this is depletedcrisis could occur globally. Fossil fuel reserves will not
then it is gone completely.last long, especially at the rate oil and gas are
Fossil fuels are slowly being used up, and alternativeconsumed around the world.
energy sources that are renewable will have to be