Nuclear Energy - The Green Solution

The United States with less than 5% of the world'sour energy needs. Historically, at least, the problem
population consumes roughly 25% of the world'swith nuclear energy has been primarily two fold. First,
energy. Some might argue that this is egregious,the "China Syndrome" problem of a meltdown of a
while others would say that it is simply a yardstick byreactor which could release a large amount of
which the world's largest economy is measured. Butradioactivity and second, what do we do with nuclear
for whatever the reason for our vast consumptionwaste material that has a half-life of over 25,000
of energy, the fact remains that in order to consumeyears! The perception of these two significant
you first have to produce. And as most of ourobstacles might doom a new nuclear drive and stand
energy comes from burning fossil fuels- whichin the way of an energy-independent United
wouldn't be too bad except that:States.However, there are new technologies in this
burning vast amounts of fossil fuels in this countyfield that, like the cavalry, have come to our rescue-
alone dumps millions of pounds of earth warmingand none too soon. First, there is a new class of
greenhouse gasses into, what appears, is a fragilenuclear reactors that have their nuclear fuel so
atmosphere, every day. Just warming up thestructured that they cannot do a melt down. Turn
atmosphere a couple of degrees on average hasoff the cooling to this new nuclear reactor and it only
significant impact. Look no further than last year'sgets a bit hotter. No big deal. Turn the cooling back
hurricane season. The worst on record. And...let's noton and it runs more efficiently. Okay, one down. But
forget its close cousin; smog pollution, which adds towhat about all that radioactive spent reactor fuel?
respiratory problems and other health conditions, notLet's see if we can put some perspective on it. If
to mention the visual blight hanging over our cities asyou gathered all the spent nuclear fuel in this country
well. In addition...have you filled your tank recently?under one roof it would fill a typical high school gym.
Paid the heating bill? The cost of all fossil fuels, evenNot too unmanageable. Moreover, the spent fuel is
coal has increased significantly. As other emergingencapsulated in super strong glass beads, which in
economies such as China and India vie for ever moreturn are embedded into hardened concrete inside
limited resources, all bets are that the costs willsteel drums. This makes the waste product
continue to climb over the long haul. Moreover...as we"transportable" and is designed to withstand the
import most of our oil nowadays- we are increasinglyelements for 10,000 years. Nevertheless, even in it's
held hostage to an unstable supply from a number oftomb it is still relativity radioactive. Most of these
countries that we, for whatever reasons, aredrums are stored in water as radiation cannot
increasingly unpopular with. The end game? If ourpenetrate more than about 3 feet of water.
supply of oil is not first arbitrarily cut off, as itHowever, no one seems anxious to have it in their
becomes increasingly scarce the price will rise until ourback yards. A political hot potato to be sure.But while
growth is strangled. In either case we will feelour politicians don't have the answer, the earth does.
impelled to engage in war with other rising powers toThe answer lies in the bottom of the Marianas
secure our supplies.Trench in the Pacific. It is the deepest place in the
ocean (over seven miles) and one of the fastest
The bottom line: Fossil fuels are not only hazardousmoving subduction plates on earth. If the drums of
to our health (and the planet's) but may in fact bewaste were placed in the bottom of the trench, they
hazardous to the American way of life.But if energywould, within a few hundred years, be swallowed up
is the lifeblood of our economy what are we to do?into the bowels of the earth and blend into the
Wind? Solar? While anything we can do other thanearth's core where heat and pressure (caused in part
consume fossil fuels will help, these sources ofby radioactive substances contained within the earth)
energy are relatively diffuse and inconsistent. In otherrendered insignificant.Given the current geopolitical
words, their "cost to calorie" ratios are not efficientsituation, which only seems to be working to our
and they are not always dependable. As Jamesdisadvantage, limited resources for cheap fossil fuels,
Kunstler points out in his intriguing book The Longnot to mention the environmental impacts we are
Emergency, one of our best options out of thesestarting to experience, it is time we take drastic
dilemmas is to do an "Apollo Project" type effort tomeasures to get us off our fossil fuel addition. Let's
develop additional, new nuclear energy capability. As ithope we are not too late.John Woolf is the founder
turns out, it just may be the greenest, viableof several successful Internet technology companies
alternate we have.The U.S. currently produces aboutincluding the Book Price Comparison website As a
20% of its electrical power from nuclear power. Thepragmatist of the world around him, he is both a critic
advantages are; that there are no greenhouseand crusader on international politics and energy policy
emissions into the atmosphere, no visual pollution, it isas it relates to our security and our impact on the
cost relatively cost effective, quiet and we haveglobal environment.Visit to read reviews, find similar
sufficient supply of uranium here at home for thetitles, and search for the lowest possible price for
foreseeable future to provide for a major portion ofThe Long Emergency and other great books.